When on earth did I say change the rear wheels only!??!?!
Er, lots and lots of times?
No, I'm afraid I'm not. It really isn't up for debate - you ALWAYS change rear tyres first, understeer is controllable, snap oversteer isn't.
Like there?
Nevertheless, as I said, you're all driving £15k+ cars, why on earth would you only replace 2 tyres anyway!? It's all 4, or if you are **that** cheap, just the rears - there is no justification to change the fronts only.
And there?
No, you have to change the rears first, then the fronts.
I've been fairly consistent with what I've been saying.
Change all 4 ... or if you insist on changing some, change the rears - so as to not compromise the stability of the car.
You have repeatedly insisted that it is better to fit a single pair of winter tyres to the rear wheels than to the front. This is batcrap insane, and what people are calling you on.
Get it into your head, everyone agrees that fitting four winter tyres is the best thing to do.
There are different opinions as to how acceptable the disadvantages are of fitting winter tyres to the front wheels only, in comparison to doing all four. Some people point to the rear-end instability and say it's not worth the risk, others say that this risk can be minimised by driving within the limits of the tyres. This is a sensible debate, with reasonable points on both sides.
You are declaring that A. it is better to fit a pair of winter tyres to the real wheels of a front-wheel-drive, than to the front wheels, and that B. it is better not to fit any winter tyres at all than to do the front only.
Both of these claims are bordering on the insane, and you have provided no backing for either of them.
Rolfe.