« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4

Author Topic: golf bhp?  (Read 3962 times)

Offline eightyeightmph

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,675
Re: golf bhp?
« Reply #20 on: 19 November 2008, 14:09 »
I'm only going on what I've read here, but isn't the valver restricted because it was capable of giving similar Bhp to the VR?

Let's be honest, the VR has a pretty poor output for that size engine! :smiley:
Logged
2016 GOLF GTD

Offline Horney

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 10,782
  • Racing, Trackdays, Starwars.
Re: golf bhp?
« Reply #21 on: 19 November 2008, 14:16 »
Pretty sure the ABF was restricted by use of tame cams and restrictive inlet. You can't just turn off 12% of the power of an engine via the ECU and still get it to run right and be fuel efficient.

Nick
Logged

Offline boneybradley

  • Forum Supporter
  • Serious forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,482
  • Back in a Mk3...
Re: golf bhp?
« Reply #22 on: 19 November 2008, 14:17 »
As said but also all engines are restricted in some way to make emmisions better, so the engine lasts longer and to increase mpg!!
the 16v possibly can give 175bhp by simply adjusting the electronics and "simple" parts but 148 is about right for the Era (the rival's rs2000 had 150, astra gsi had 150 too)
Logged
Moderator of The Dub-Tug Squad!! (What some call the MK3 section!)



Full range of quality parts for your Volkswagen available at Oemandmore.co.uk

Offline Wayne

  • Sir Postalot
  • *
  • Posts: 32,051
Re: golf bhp?
« Reply #23 on: 19 November 2008, 14:31 »
Quote from: eightyeightmph on 19 November 2008, 14:09
I'm only going on what I've read here, but isn't the valver restricted because it was capable of giving similar Bhp to the VR?

Let's be honest, the VR has a pretty poor output for that size engine! :smiley:

I have read that many times and I don't believe it, the VR6 was aimed at different market, as bb said 150 was about right for the time it was on sale.
Logged

Offline davero

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 710
Re: golf bhp?
« Reply #24 on: 19 November 2008, 15:23 »
Was lead the beleive that a remap on a 16v was good for about 6bhp. This was from a local specialist
Logged

Offline eightyeightmph

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,675
Re: golf bhp?
« Reply #25 on: 19 November 2008, 16:33 »
Quote from: dave16v on 19 November 2008, 15:23
Was lead the beleive that a remap on a 16v was good for about 6bhp. This was from a local specialist

Only 6 Bhp?? That's nothing? Why do people bother? :huh:
Logged
2016 GOLF GTD

Offline AudiA8Quattro

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,776
Re: golf bhp?
« Reply #26 on: 19 November 2008, 16:44 »
Quote from: dave16v on 19 November 2008, 15:23
Was lead the beleive that a remap on a 16v was good for about 6bhp. This was from a local specialist

That sounds about right, you aren't going get big increases remapping an NA engine.
Logged
FOR DIY GUIDES GO TO <br>www.volkswagenaudi.co.uk<br/>BRAKES, SUSPENSION, CV JOINTS

Offline MK3GTI_16Valve

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Re: golf bhp?
« Reply #27 on: 19 November 2008, 17:10 »
6 bhp to me sounds right aswell. Gains of 26 bhp with a std turbo engine no problem but our 16v's no chance. If only it could be done :smiley:. I'm sure R-tech would back that up
Logged

Offline beccasmk3gti

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 317
  • golf mk3 gti and a mk3 vr6 182bhp and 223nm
Re: golf bhp?
« Reply #28 on: 19 November 2008, 19:17 »
bhp gains will be low on a n/a car but its the amount of mappable things you can do ie setting the torque where you want on the power band etc. that appels from a remap
Logged

Offline Ads

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 175
  • 8V RULES BABY!
Re: golf bhp?
« Reply #29 on: 19 November 2008, 19:35 »
Hey.

I read my printout completly wrong.

The car went in as 148.4bhp and after a livemap was 165.1.

I understand some rollers are different but the gain was noticeable!

Believe it or not, as long as i noticed it thats all what counts!
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
« previous next »