Author Topic: OFFICIAL OLYMPICS Thread  (Read 15085 times)

jockgti

  • Guest
Re: OFFICIAL OLYMPICS Thread
« Reply #40 on: 29 July 2012, 11:22 »
i watch bike riding quite a bit and what they did is normal,usually more people help you catch the pack but nobody helped,if they had chased them down they wouldn't have any puff left at the end for the sprinters just the way it goes sometimes

Offline Thom89

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,096
  • Looking for an "Icebreaker"
Re: OFFICIAL OLYMPICS Thread
« Reply #41 on: 29 July 2012, 11:59 »
did anybody spot the nazi saluting the germans....look at boris and camilla
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-em8PfEFZoI

Yeah it did make me chuckle too!  :grin:

The funny thing about this was, what was happening in the background! look again, and you'll see Camilla and Boris wetting themselves :grin:

Thom

Offline golf-sib

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,652
  • Турботазик
Re: OFFICIAL OLYMPICS Thread
« Reply #42 on: 29 July 2012, 13:26 »
GB won anything yet or they busy still going around going bruppp brupp in front of a camera and loosing to kazakstan?


Audi TT - K04 TFSI Hybrid - 325BHP
VW Golf - k03 AGU - 200BHP

1.8T AGU..
R135
╚╬╬╝
  24


My Chinese Bike project: http://xtrsproject.wordpress.com/

jockgti

  • Guest
Re: OFFICIAL OLYMPICS Thread
« Reply #43 on: 29 July 2012, 13:29 »
bugger all so far

jockgti

  • Guest
Re: OFFICIAL OLYMPICS Thread
« Reply #44 on: 29 July 2012, 15:39 »
scratch that we have a silver

Offline R32UK

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,683
Re: OFFICIAL OLYMPICS Thread
« Reply #45 on: 29 July 2012, 15:40 »
What about the sports version of iPlayer DubFan mentioned earlier?

Beijing cheated with CGI effects for the fireworks going off over the city, that's an instant fail and disqualification for best Olympic opening ceremony imo

thats an instant fail in my book  :shocked: didnt know that!!

dont forget though that fireworks and labour are much cheaper in Beijing  :lipsrsealed:

Offline Steve30

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,519
  • Ed30 .
Re: OFFICIAL OLYMPICS Thread
« Reply #46 on: 29 July 2012, 21:26 »
OUSEPH Rajiv Come on team GB Badminton ......

Tiguan quicker than the Golf

Offline Guy

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,118
Re: OFFICIAL OLYMPICS Thread
« Reply #47 on: 29 July 2012, 23:03 »
What about the sports version of iPlayer DubFan mentioned earlier?

Beijing cheated with CGI effects for the fireworks going off over the city, that's an instant fail and disqualification for best Olympic opening ceremony imo

thats an instant fail in my book  :shocked: didnt know that!!

dont forget though that fireworks and labour are much cheaper in Beijing  :lipsrsealed:

yeah the firework 'footprints' were fake... mind you I am not so sure that QEII skydived into the stadium  :wink:

Offline Guy

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,118
Re: OFFICIAL OLYMPICS Thread
« Reply #48 on: 29 July 2012, 23:33 »
Why the hell is it in french first.   someone remind them we in britain!

It might something to do with the official languages of the Olympic Committee are French, English and then the native language of the host city.

I must say that compared to 2008 the London opening ceremony was a bit of a disappointment. Remember the 2008 drummers and their glowing drumsticks?

might be something to do with the budget?? what exactly were you expecting?

i thought it was excellent, much more impressed than I though it would be!

For the Olympics, something more spectacular than that. Compare it to the Beijing 2008 (which is a natural thing to do) and you can see how poorly executed the London one was. We have so much culture and history to draw upon that it could have been amazing and on a much grander scale.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOijH0xinTE

It seems like we put on a panto and Beijing put on a Cirque du Soleil show.

It's the Olympics and we have spent so many billions already on it that we could have put on a better show than that.

disagree... not to be difficult, i just do

i have just watched the beijing opening again and it was very good at the time but i think the London one was more inventive... china has a vast resource of people (and fireworks) and it was just typically 'chinese'.. lots of people in rows doing things in time etc... not really that different from any other olympic ceremony

the London 2012 Opening was completely different.. very inventive and humourous and Danny Boyle used his film direction superbly to mix with the live action... LED units in the audience to display different effects (did China have that... noop!) was also good so instead of wasted space and a sea of flash bulbs the whole stadium was utilised. olympic rings that were forged from molten steel and then raised into the air above the stadium, ancient england being transformed into the industrial revolution and then into the modern era and the invention of the interwebs, mr bean with the london philharmonic orchestra dreaming about chariots of fire, clouds that rained, a sky diving monarch, the flame being delivered by speedboat via being under a tower bridge with fireworks on it.. the most amazing and beautiful lighting ceremony with an incredible couldron... great music all the way through (granted... he should have left out paul mccartney)

so i am going to ask you again... just what were you expecting?  :huh:

Offline bobotheclown

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 680
Re: OFFICIAL OLYMPICS Thread
« Reply #49 on: 30 July 2012, 08:49 »
Scale, it just didn't have the drama and scale.

It felt too initmate and local compared to a massive stadium gig.

Don't get me wrong, I love intimate gigs but this is the Olympics and I was expecting Queen 1986 Wemble Stadium not Ed Sheeran at the Apollo, which is what I thought we got.

Take the Sir Tim Berners Lee moment. We could have utilised the LED units to display a massive montage of websites scolling around the stadium. Instead we had him standing there waving. He invented and gave to the world for free the web which is probably the most important invention the world has seen so far. It has revolutionised how people access information and knowledge. It was fitting to have it at the end but it could have been more grand and spectacular.
« Last Edit: 30 July 2012, 09:01 by bobotheclown »