GTi's kill SLK's....
Enuf said 
Not the 350 or the AMG 55 
Mine's Mullah'd more than one 350 SLK 
So you are telling me that you weren't fishing with that comment?
Or intimating that the 350 and AMG are FASTER and better than a GTI?
Come on Newgolf, don't try p!ssing on someone's bonfire when you've just posted the fuel! 
In a friendly tone, so as not misconstrued.

Not at all Hurdy, mine was a tongue in cheek friendly, (but
factual by the way) comment back to Mike, whos posts are always funny and interesting.
He was, by the way, referring to a standard GTI. (Which has a 0-62 in 6.9 seconds and a top speed of 145mph).
I was referring to the 350SLK, Which has a 0-62 in 5.4 seconds and a top speed of 155mph electronically restricted. Thats from the showroom, by the way, no additional parts added, and it will do this day in, day out. Hence, they ARE faster than a GTI, AND the ED30. By over a second 0-62.

Going further, an AMG 55 SLK has a 0-62 in 4.9 seconds and a top speed of 155mph again electronically restricted.
From memory, a STANDARD ED30 has a 0-62 in 6.6 seconds and a top speed of 151mph.
There was never any mention of "fishing", "pi$$ing" or "better than" as you mention it, intended or otherwise. You really shouldn't read things that aren't there

Of course a GTI would kill an SLK, the
only one being a 200 Kompressor.
No one mentioned ED30 and their total road dominance, (Next i'll hear Audi have now dumped their V8 FSI from the R8 and just used a remapped ED30 ??

) WE ALL KNOW THEY ARE FAST, move on it gets boring hearing about how they beat Lewis Hamilton on the way to Tesco's in his Ferrari etc...
I'm not going to comment any further as I'm finding "mines faster than yours" a little tedious.
Oh apart from