Author Topic: Chip or re-map?  (Read 10442 times)

Offline ramrod

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
Re: Chip or re-map?
« Reply #50 on: 03 October 2010, 01:19 »
A standard fuel pressure regulator will keep a constant pressure.
Uprated regulators are pointless without other mods.

care to elaborate? :nerd:
Mk6 Gti - current daily
Mk3 16v Anni - retired daily now parked on 200,300 miles

Offline Wayne

  • Sir Postalot
  • *
  • Posts: 32,051
Re: Chip or re-map?
« Reply #51 on: 03 October 2010, 09:45 »
A standard fuel pressure regulator will keep a constant pressure.
Uprated regulators are pointless without other mods.

care to elaborate? :nerd:

A power boost valve looses against the engine sensors eg: lambda,knock sensor etc (the valve adds fuel then the ecu reduces it)....so there basically pointless/useless!

and the ebay chips make the ecu think it needs more fuel and possibly advance the timing but I doubt the engine will like it for long!! Good petrol (98ron+) is possibly a better option?

As above it will gain you nothing, on older cars they did help a little.

Offline ramrod

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
Re: Chip or re-map?
« Reply #52 on: 03 October 2010, 10:36 »
A standard fuel pressure regulator will keep a constant pressure.
Uprated regulators are pointless without other mods.

care to elaborate? :nerd:

A power boost valve looses against the engine sensors eg: lambda,knock sensor etc (the valve adds fuel then the ecu reduces it)....so there basically pointless/useless!

and the ebay chips make the ecu think it needs more fuel and possibly advance the timing but I doubt the engine will like it for long!! Good petrol (98ron+) is possibly a better option?

As above it will gain you nothing, on older cars they did help a little.

Cheers Wayne

Looks like im just going to have to lose some weight then if i want a quicker throttle response :)
Mk6 Gti - current daily
Mk3 16v Anni - retired daily now parked on 200,300 miles

Offline AudiA8Quattro

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,776
Re: Chip or re-map?
« Reply #53 on: 03 October 2010, 12:41 »
A standard fuel pressure regulator will keep a constant pressure.
Uprated regulators are pointless without other mods.

care to elaborate? :nerd:

You don't need uprated fuel pressure unless the engine has been heavily modified.
For example ported head, uprated cams then it might have a small effect top end.
I would think to get real benefit you would need to have a higher revving engine, as the engine may be slightly lean top end.
The best person to ask is Glen (ess_three), our no.1 engineer on here  :smiley:
FOR DIY GUIDES GO TO <br>www.volkswagenaudi.co.uk<br/>BRAKES, SUSPENSION, CV JOINTS

Offline Ess_Three

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,123
Re: Chip or re-map?
« Reply #54 on: 03 October 2010, 18:12 »
The best person to ask is Glen (ess_three), our no.1 engineer on here  :smiley:

I'm no expert!
I've just been down the road of buying all the crap that is supposed to make a big differnce...only to find it doesn't do anything.
I've spent thousands finding out the hard way.

The bottom line is: There is no cheap fix.
ABFs do not make  170+ BHP by just looking at them.
They were not 'strangled' by VW to only make 150BHP...so don't go looking for an easy 20 BHP.
They do not make 190+ BHP without spending many thousands on good old fashoined engineering solutions to the same problems every other engine has.
...and if you chase 200+ BHP, you'll find much of the so called 'good kit' doesn't fit...so you'll have to engineer it yourself.

Reducing my Golf count by the week....
..but gaining motorcycles.

Offline Khare

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,627
  • The bear that khares
Re: Chip or re-map?
« Reply #55 on: 03 October 2010, 18:20 »
So what's your view on power boost valves then?

Offline ramrod

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
Re: Chip or re-map?
« Reply #56 on: 03 October 2010, 19:18 »
So what's your view on power boost valves then?

lol you took the words out of my mouth!!

Mk6 Gti - current daily
Mk3 16v Anni - retired daily now parked on 200,300 miles

Offline Khare

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,627
  • The bear that khares
Re: Chip or re-map?
« Reply #57 on: 03 October 2010, 19:30 »
 :wink:

Offline Ess_Three

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,123
Re: Chip or re-map?
« Reply #58 on: 03 October 2010, 19:30 »
So what's your view on power boost valves then?

Waste of time...just adding fuel everywhere, which gives the closed loop lambda control a headache.
If you need more fuel, add it properly via an ECU calibration.

Out of interest, I tried a 4 bar FPR in my 16v on the dyno one day...it lost power and ran badly (over-fuelling) swapped back to the 3 bar FPR and I got the power back.

Reducing my Golf count by the week....
..but gaining motorcycles.

Offline Khare

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,627
  • The bear that khares
Re: Chip or re-map?
« Reply #59 on: 03 October 2010, 19:33 »
So what's your view on power boost valves then?

Waste of time...just adding fuel everywhere, which gives the closed loop lambda control a headache.
If you need more fuel, add it properly via an ECU calibration.

Out of interest, I tried a 4 bar FPR in my 16v on the dyno one day...it lost power and ran badly (over-fuelling) swapped back to the 3 bar FPR and I got the power back.

Glad you said that cos I was thinking of getting hold of a 4 bar FPR. Glad I didn't now then.