Author Topic: 0-60 times golf3 20 8v  (Read 26910 times)

Offline Pimpster

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 223
Re:0-60 times golf3 20 8v
« Reply #50 on: 14 April 2004, 19:18 »
p.s erm, didnt the focus beat the mk4 in all the tests?

p.p.s - and now you're changing you're arguement from about how quick it is to how good it is. nicely dodged. yes we'll agree it is a good car.
« Last Edit: 14 April 2004, 19:20 by Pimpster »

Offline Cupra Turbo

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,299
Re:0-60 times golf3 20 8v
« Reply #51 on: 14 April 2004, 20:41 »
Quote
because anything over 9 secs is pretty average to below average

bollox

ya just saying that so the 8.7secs 16v can be classed as more than average!

-----

7secs or under is fast... and thats a proper HOT HATCH.

11.5secs and over  is. ... town car

Anything in between is normal.


That includes: -

Focus ST170
Golf (except VR6/V6/R32)
1.8T 150/180
Astra SRI 1.8/2.0/2.2 (none turbo)
Pug 106 GTI
VTS/VTR

etc .. those are normal, everyday cars... not FAST cars....



« Last Edit: 14 April 2004, 20:43 by Black_GTI »

http://www.golfgtiforum.co.uk/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=38

Modified Golf GTI, 130Bhp(est), All Smoked Plus Quad Headl

Offline Bodhi

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 123
  • Please make those nasty VR6 owners go away....
Re:0-60 times golf3 20 8v
« Reply #52 on: 14 April 2004, 20:56 »
So we seem to have agreed that the 8v is slower than faster cars and faster than slower cars. That's how I'd sum up how the argument seems to be going. Doesn't make much sense.

It does seem that an awful lot of people here weren't around when VW launched the Mk3 GTi. I remember the roadtest (can't remember if it was Performance Car or Car magazine), pitting the Mk3 against it's ancestors. The result? The Mk3 won (and I remember this, cos at the tme I was rooting for the Mk2 - I was 11 years old. The magazine claimed it had all the performance of the Mk2 8v (remember people there is more to performance than a straight line - what a Mk3 loses on the straights it gets back in the corners), but with oodles more equipment, safety and refinement. It wasn't until the Mk4 came along that VW tried its best to kill the GTi, with a soggy chassis,a breathless 1.8 litre engine and more rubber in the suspension than a tyre factory. Unfortunately it seems to have tainted people's memories of the Mk3, which was actually a well sorted, punchy car.

The Mk3 can easily be prodded to very fast road speeds, and it can maintain them once it gets up there. I'd call that a pretty fast car.
1997 Tornado Red GTi 8v - The Fastest HotBox on Fife's roads.

Modifications -

1 x Kenwood KDC-7024M
1 x Dull Aluminium Golf Ball Gearknob. Clearly worth about 10bhp on its own.

golfvr6

  • Guest
Re:0-60 times golf3 20 8v
« Reply #53 on: 14 April 2004, 21:10 »
Another great comment there Bodhi,

The magazine claimed it had all the performance of the Mk2 8v (remember people there is more to performance than a straight line - what a Mk3 loses on the straights it gets in the corners)

So do you agree with that? a mk3 handles better than a mk2?
You really are full of knowledge.
 :D

Offline golf3 20lt 8v

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 11
Re:0-60 times golf3 20 8v
« Reply #54 on: 14 April 2004, 21:12 »
 sounds like we all in agreement then mrk 3 gti 8v does 0-60 in under 9 seconds, the question has now changed slightly into what is fast?

Offline Cupra Turbo

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,299
Re:0-60 times golf3 20 8v
« Reply #55 on: 14 April 2004, 22:25 »
Id be realistic..

Standard 115bhp GTI 8v - 9.0secs to 60.

Modded 130bhp GTI 8v - 8.6secs to 60

Standard 150bhp GTI 16v - 8.0secs to 60

...

Thats me sorted then LOL


.. tho the real VW figures are

10.2 and 8.7 respectively.. but everyone claims the 16v figures are wrong and its quicker and the 8v figures are right ... basically cos they hate VW for giving the 8v the GTI badge... and wanna make it look "even" slower compared to the 16v ... when according to VW theres only 1.5secs difference...  ::)


http://www.golfgtiforum.co.uk/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=38

Modified Golf GTI, 130Bhp(est), All Smoked Plus Quad Headl

golfvr6

  • Guest
Re:0-60 times golf3 20 8v
« Reply #56 on: 14 April 2004, 22:38 »
I think its fair to say the mk3 8v could do with modding to make it a hot hatch.
This isn't that expensive or hard to do.
Cam next black?

Offline Cupra Turbo

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,299
Re:0-60 times golf3 20 8v
« Reply #57 on: 14 April 2004, 22:45 »
Well I have modded mine ...  ;D

Headlights next though... cant see in the dark with these things.


... dunno about the cam... getting rid of it next summer hopefully... if i've got a nice secure job.

1.8T 150bhp I think ... chipped to 180.

Looked at the V5 170... sounds nice... with it being a V engine, but cant be chipped as well as a Turbo engine  ;)

http://www.golfgtiforum.co.uk/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=38

Modified Golf GTI, 130Bhp(est), All Smoked Plus Quad Headl

golfvr6

  • Guest
Re:0-60 times golf3 20 8v
« Reply #58 on: 14 April 2004, 22:49 »
Probably get the v5 up to 200bhp with filter/exhaust/chip.
It is in effect a vr5, same configuration as my car but only 5 cylinders done at a 15 degree angle.

Offline Cupra Turbo

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,299
Re:0-60 times golf3 20 8v
« Reply #59 on: 14 April 2004, 23:02 »
yea well its one of those decisions but ive got 15month to make it LOL


Turbo charged.... just... saying those words ... summet about it

or a nice sounding "V" engine...

thing is, the early V5's were only 150bhp and they weigh more than the 1.8T's by about 70kg... and I cant afford a newer V5 (170bhp), unless my wage doubles in the next year or so!


http://www.golfgtiforum.co.uk/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=38

Modified Golf GTI, 130Bhp(est), All Smoked Plus Quad Headl