It's funny how when a car pulls up next to you at the traffic lights, it gives you an itchy feeling to upgrade your own! Driving down on a dual carriage way with a 50 limit I spotted a PW R doing 30 (?!) so I passed by with my Mk6 GTI. Clearly he wasn't having it and at the next set of traffic lights I was stopped at the line and he pulled up next to me. Obviously I didn't fancy looking like an idiot and didn't bother to race him!
Nevertheless I now have an itchy feeling to upgrade, not this year but maybe the next.
I've specced up an R and an S3 to almost exactly the same standard: DSG, metallic paint, leather, sunroof, ACC, navigation/audio and panoramic roof. To my surprise the Audi came in at 37k and the R to 38k.
This brought me to the eternal question of why have an R rather than the S3? I'm not looking at PCP or lease but just a plain comparison if I were to buy it outright. Depreciation should benefit the S3 (especially with all those Rs on lease!). The only thing I can think of is how they drive, S3 might be slightly softer but I reckon it feels more premium inside. And of course bad luck of pulling up to an RS3 at the lights.....
I also looked at the GTI vs the Cupra 280 to compare, not that I'll buy one. With similar spec, the GTI is 35k and the Cupra is 30k! If you're not a badge snob then why not go for the more powerful Cupra? Granted the interior is not as good and you don't have the heritage, but surely you can bag yourself a decent discount to offset the higher depreciation (thats what I think at least)?
What are your thoughts?
I also wondered about the S3 and was looking at that more than the R initially. As someone who thinks the standard spec of the R is perfectly adequate (don’t feel the need for leather, as long as we have Xenons, Dab, auto lights/wipers/mirrors and 18” alloys I’m perfectly happy), there was quite a gap between the S3 and the R. The S3 has none of the things I’d consider essential, apart from Xenons (and they’re not adaptive, that’s extra on the S3), to get the S3 to the same spec as the basic R (or GTI/GTD), and ignoring the fact S3 has nice leather equivalent to our Nappa options, you need to spend £2700 on the S3. If you wanted Nappa, then the 2 are more evened out on cost.
Of the 3 cars you have listed there, the Cupra will probably be the most fun (mainly for the fear of losing grip if you’re not careful), but it will be the dearest option on a monthly basis. GFV on the Cupra is 47%, and I can’t see you getting much more than 12% discount that you can achieve with the R. I’m not a fan of Seat interiors, very minimalist and cheapest looking/feeling of the VAG range.
You’d probably be surprised to know that the R beats the S3 (on paper at least) for depreciation. GFV on S3 is 56% and for the R it’s 60%. When I was trying to negotiate a deal on the S3, the dealership was very non-committal on true p/x values. He alluded to maybe offering £2500 over GFV in p/x, but that would most likely come at the expense of any discount leverage on the new one. At least with past experience with VW, you can usually get £1000 over GFV and seek out maximum discount (or the equivalent cost to change, whichever way the dealership writes it up).
For me wanting to add my essential options to the S3, taking into account better discount available on the R and a better GFV, the S3 was going to cost me about £5k more over 3 years than the R was.
I do think that VAG cars are getting duller on the drive with each generation, but that is the way cars are going in general. They’re much more polished (when they’re fully working), and the rawness is diminishing every time a new one comes out. More performance, but feeling slower due to how smooth they are.
My Scirocco 170TDI definitely felt faster and more fun than my GTD does (without the DTUK box), but there are times when you do appreciate the refinement too (and definitely far more standard equipment).
I’ve gotten the speed bug since being a bit underwhelmed by the lack of fun in the GTD (hence the DTUK box), and the sh!te grip (Bridgestones) is the icing on the cake. So with the R I’m saying “bollocks to the mpg” (it’s worse than the GTI, but who even buys a GTI for mpg?) and looking forward to some confident grip (it would have been a fair bit cheaper to just buy a set of 4 Michelins!). The cost for me to change an 18 month old GTD to a new R is £8500, and considering the R is costing £4700 more (RRP) and has a GFV £4k better than the GTD, I think I’ve done alright out of it.