Author Topic: k04-001 vs k280  (Read 3310 times)

Offline benmanc

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 433
k04-001 vs k280
« on: 08 September 2014, 20:00 »
I was planning getting a k280 but may look at getting a k04-001 (maybe used but recon'd)

Which?

Why?

Offline Scott D

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 536
Re: k04-001 vs k280
« Reply #1 on: 08 September 2014, 20:08 »
k04-001 will max out at 260-270 probably get a little more from the K280

Plenty of low down torque with the K04-001 but puts it within bending rods territory.

I would go for a K300 as future proofing if want more power later on
2003 1.8T GTI 180 - APR Stage I, S2000 Filter, R-Tech Supersize TIP, Bilstein B12 Suspension, 18" OZ Superleggera, Recaro Heated Leathers, US Spec Rear Lights, N249/SAI/PCV Delete

1.8T AUQ - 241bhp & 286 ft-lb
R-Tech Map, Forge FMIC, SFS Oversized TIP, Ported Manifold, Milltek Turboback non res exhaust, Forge 007p, N249 & N112 delete, SAI delete, S2000 Air Filter, Sachs clutch & Lightweight Flywheel

Offline benmanc

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 433
Re: k04-001 vs k280
« Reply #2 on: 08 September 2014, 21:15 »
I pretty much ruled k300 out because it means going rods and diff etc etc

I know it can be mapped more gentle but pointless extra money

Its more acceleration im after rather than top end speed

Offline Scott D

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 536
Re: k04-001 vs k280
« Reply #3 on: 08 September 2014, 21:26 »
300ft-lb possible with the K04-001

Had one on briefly and it was quick on the road after some R-Tech magic. Not a world of difference from a K03s though
2003 1.8T GTI 180 - APR Stage I, S2000 Filter, R-Tech Supersize TIP, Bilstein B12 Suspension, 18" OZ Superleggera, Recaro Heated Leathers, US Spec Rear Lights, N249/SAI/PCV Delete

1.8T AUQ - 241bhp & 286 ft-lb
R-Tech Map, Forge FMIC, SFS Oversized TIP, Ported Manifold, Milltek Turboback non res exhaust, Forge 007p, N249 & N112 delete, SAI delete, S2000 Air Filter, Sachs clutch & Lightweight Flywheel

Offline rockmonkey69

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 937
Re: k04-001 vs k280
« Reply #4 on: 08 September 2014, 21:32 »
I highly rate the k300, as a street car it is quite capable even though all out power wasn't the goal my golf has over 300bhp per ton, the power holds pretty well for a small frame turbo, mine holds over 300bhp even at 7000rpm. But as you say it's a good idea to do the rods and then you want to make the most of all that power with a good setup and LSD at a minimum. Though it sounds a lot, it makes for an effective setup.

Offline benmanc

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 433
Re: k04-001 vs k280
« Reply #5 on: 08 September 2014, 21:54 »
Talking an extra £1.5k or so for rods and lsd though, right?

Offline rockmonkey69

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 937
Re: k04-001 vs k280
« Reply #6 on: 08 September 2014, 22:10 »
LSD is about £700-800, conrods are about $400usd, if you aren't able to rebuild the engine and gearbox yourself then fitting cost will be more or less what you expect to pay for a engine and gearbox rebuild.

Offline golfyste

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,767
  • Project track car
Re: k04-001 vs k280
« Reply #7 on: 12 September 2014, 09:38 »
K04-001 is a k03s with slightly bigger turbine. Give a tad more torque and about 10bhp extra on the top end.
K280 is k04 internals in a k03 and will flow more.


R-tech custom remap - k04-001- 250bhp/311ftlb  :grin:

"Project track car" has begun :grin:

http://www.golfgtiforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=247202.0