Author Topic: GTI & GTD official MPG  (Read 21646 times)

Offline Sootchucker

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,348
GTI & GTD official MPG
« on: 16 July 2013, 07:56 »
We all know the hype that's surrounded both cars and their "claimed" MPG figures which are vastly improved over the outgoing models, which again we all know are not really achievable in real life, but are more for comparisons purposes.

I did have a thought though. As both cars in Germany come "standard" with 17" alloys (with our UK standard fit 18"s being a cost option), I assume the figures produced are done with the smaller wheels ? That being the case, how much do you think the 18's will wipe off the claimed figures ?
2022 Tiguan R-Line 2.0 TSI 4-Motion. Nightshade blue, pano roof, IQ lights, Nav Pro, Harmon Kardon, Heated Windscreen, Heated rear seats, Wireless charging, Heads up display, dual height boot floor, Keyless with electric tailgate, Electronic TPMS, underbody protection, Area View Cameras

Offline Jimble

  • Moderator
  • Forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,661
Re: GTI & GTD official MPG
« Reply #1 on: 16 July 2013, 08:19 »
The actual rolling circumference between 17" and 18" wheels are pretty much the same as the tyres on the 18's are lower profile, so basically the diameter of the wheel and tyre are the same whichever you choose so it shouldn't make a difference, there was no difference in mpg if you had 17's or 18's on the mk6.
Currently pootling around in our family wagen, a Tiguan SEL 😂

Online JoeGTI

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,341
Re: GTI & GTD official MPG
« Reply #2 on: 16 July 2013, 08:44 »
Are the 18's wider?

Either way, the difference is likely to be tiny, if any at all.
MK8.5 GTI Clubsport. Moonstone grey. Queenstown 19’s. DCC. Harmon Kardon sound. Pano roof.

Offline monkeyhanger

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,662
Re: GTI & GTD official MPG
« Reply #3 on: 16 July 2013, 08:47 »
We all know the hype that's surrounded both cars and their "claimed" MPG figures which are vastly improved over the outgoing models, which again we all know are not really achievable in real life, but are more for comparisons purposes.

I did have a thought though. As both cars in Germany come "standard" with 17" alloys (with our UK standard fit 18"s being a cost option), I assume the figures produced are done with the smaller wheels ? That being the case, how much do you think the 18's will wipe off the claimed figures ?

I don’t think it’ll have any effect at all – the 17” wheels are just as wide as the 18” Nogaros and Austins at 225mm.
Whatever the computer indicates, you can knock 9% off it for actuals. Using the brim filling method, my Scirocco 170TDI averaged 49.8mpg on it's last tankful according to the computer, but just 45.4mpg in terms of miles covered vs actual fuel consumed.
My dad’s GTD DSG 5 door officially does 60.1mpg combined. On his last tankful at approx. 900 miles in, it indicated 47mpg but actually did 39mpg. I know it has a bit of running in yet, but with VW’s universal engine improvements touted for the MK7 variants including reduced friction surfaces, I don’t think we’ll see much in the way of “running in” gains.
Lets be clear though, my dad’s driving style is very uneconomical – he will cruise on the motorway at 85-90mph if he can get away with it (if others are doing more than that, so he doesn’t “stick out”). He’s got all the toys on and doing their thing. If I had his car right now, the way I would drive it, I would expect to outdo his economy by 10-15%. Either way, compared to his old MK5 GT 170TDI, it appears to be approx. 10% down on economy right now (and driven the same way). Driving the car straight back from Newcastle to Southampton is not the way I’d like to run my car in  either, with the first 350 miles pretty much cruising on the motorway. He’s also had the aircon on permanently since getting it.
GTD’s (and all MK7 TDIs) biggest claim to increased fuel economy that is not seen on the TSIs are revisions made to the integrated exhaust manifold set-up to quicken the warming of the engine to normal operating temperature. These will help economy on shorter runs a lot (and the effect will be prominently seen on the official urban and extra urban testing cycles), but on a long motorway journey, poor economy at the start of the journey has a negligible effect on the trip as a whole.
I hope to crack an indicated 55mpg minimum around the doors with my GTD manual as a reasonable starting point. 10% gains on the outgoing models seem far more likely than VWs touted 20%.

I do think that all those toys will have a detrimental effect on fuel economy – especially if ADC is subtly braking for you a lot if you like to drive closer to the car in front than the system would like you to. I’m used to getting very close to official combined figures on my commute and easily exceeding it on longer journeys, all without driving like a nun – I don’t think I’ll manage it this time.
I think VW may have stretched the truth a bit too much this time and test conditions are further away from real driving conditions than ever.

Those “up to 100kg weight savings” are largely nuts. Unless you’re driving a 120PS or less variant with the simplified rear suspension, you’re unlikely to see more than 35-40kg weight savings. 23kg lost from the body shell and 5kg lost from the smaller capacity fuel tank (which is 90% full for the purposes of VWs testing).
Whey ya bugger! It's finally arrived after an 8 month wait....
MK7 R 5 door, manual, Lapiz Blue, Prets.

Offline p3asa

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,460
Re: GTI & GTD official MPG
« Reply #4 on: 16 July 2013, 09:16 »
For anyone interested, here is the EU test on how manufacturers come up with those official figures.
Its an Audi short clip but its the same for all car manufacturers.
Absolute joke.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGQGzQY81Eg
HIS: R 5dr DSG Lapiz: Tech Pack: Keyless: 90% Tints: Pretorias: Rear View Camera
HERS:  GTI 5dr Manual DBP: Parking Pack: Car-Net App: 90% Privacy Glass. Ordered 05-12-15. Delivered 03-03-16
DONATED TO SON:  GTD 5dr Manual White: Nav Pro: Dynaudio: Winter Pack: Sport & Sound Pack: Rear View Camera: Park Assist. Ordered 19-02-14. Delivered: 07-06-14

Offline monkeyhanger

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,662
Re: GTI & GTD official MPG
« Reply #5 on: 16 July 2013, 10:02 »
For anyone interested, here is the EU test on how manufacturers come up with those official figures.
Its an Audi short clip but its the same for all car manufacturers.
Absolute joke.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGQGzQY81Eg

The standard EU test (directive 93/116/EEC) is quite rigid on certain aspects, but some variables have quite a wide scope for manipulation.
They can use a run in car that has more than 3000km, but less than 15000km – if you believe your VW will have significant running in gains (I don’t) – then that’s quite a range.
The car must be set up to standard tune, no extraordinary settings that the customer doesn’t have access to (no fiddling the idling, cold start device and exhaust emission control).
The car must be temperature conditioned for at least 6 hours (so that the fluids such as coolant and oil are also up to ambient temp) at 20 to 30C before the test is run (not really a cold start then, and engine temp reached significantly quicker at 30C than 20C).
Everything that is not needed for the car’s operation (such as lights, radio and aircon) are switched off as a consumer would switch off i.e. you can’t disable a system that would be on normally to do more than the consumer could do to switch it off.
All the lubes have to be standard spec,, tyres have to be standard spec and inflated as per recommendations.
So really, you only have a chance of replicating those test conditions if you switch your lights, radio and aircon off and drive your car in a 30C environment, and have done 10k miles/15k km.
That’s probably more rigid and less open to interpretation on conditions that previous regulations have allowed, but I still don’t see why they can’t standardise the temperature. Any lab worth it’s salt would be able to maintain a 20C or 30C environment +/- 1C, and I bet there’s a good 5% between the same car’s results at 20C and 30C under test conditions.
Whey ya bugger! It's finally arrived after an 8 month wait....
MK7 R 5 door, manual, Lapiz Blue, Prets.

Offline CraigW

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,305
Re: GTI & GTD official MPG
« Reply #6 on: 16 July 2013, 10:38 »
I don't understand this fascination with mpg figures. If people are so overly concerned about economy then they should have bought something less powerful (that includes the GTD). These cars are there to be enjoyed and to be driven with a sense of purpose (within reason), and not like driving Miss Daisey 

Offline Bill_the_Bear

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,038
  • Yes! Wait a minute... No!
Re: GTI & GTD official MPG
« Reply #7 on: 16 July 2013, 11:11 »
I don't understand this fascination with mpg figures

Fuel is expensive, that is all it is.  We don't want to be paying out more than we have to.  Honestly, it is a big factor for a lot of us.  Imagine if the GTI had only 15mpg, then if it had 100mpg.  Those extremes would massively affect sales.  Ergo, smaller shifts in mpg slightly affect sales.

If money were no object I'd agree with you, but then I'd probably be buying a Gallardo, not a GTI. :evil:

Also I think a lot of us will be driving "sensibly" for 90% of the time.  We want to be getting the best efficiency during that 90% just like anyone would in any other car.  But we still want that 10% of fun, that is the time when we're not thinking about mpg.
« Last Edit: 16 July 2013, 11:13 by Bill_the_Bear »

Offline CraigW

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,305
Re: GTI & GTD official MPG
« Reply #8 on: 16 July 2013, 11:45 »
I don't understand this fascination with mpg figures

Fuel is expensive, that is all it is.  We don't want to be paying out more than we have to.  Honestly, it is a big factor for a lot of us.  Imagine if the GTI had only 15mpg, then if it had 100mpg.  Those extremes would massively affect sales.  Ergo, smaller shifts in mpg slightly affect sales.

If money were no object I'd agree with you, but then I'd probably be buying a Gallardo, not a GTI. :evil:

Also I think a lot of us will be driving "sensibly" for 90% of the time.  We want to be getting the best efficiency during that 90% just like anyone would in any other car.  But we still want that 10% of fun, that is the time when we're not thinking about mpg.

Bill we all know that petrol/diesel is expensive but if economy was really a huge priority to you then you wouldn't buy these type of cars. There is no point in worrying about mpg all the time as its just going to spoil your enjoyment of the car.

Offline monkeyhanger

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,662
Re: GTI & GTD official MPG
« Reply #9 on: 16 July 2013, 12:15 »
Exactly as Bill says.
I have a habit of buying high output TDIs because they meet the balance of power and economy that I find appealing.
If I was less concerned I might’ve bought a GTI, or even less concerned then perhaps a Focus ST or Leon Cupra).
I do think that most of us here bought a GTD or GTI with economy in mind, to varying degrees (GTI is relatively frugal on paper for its output, as a petrol engined car). Neither the GTI nor GTD are bought for their outright driving thrills (you’d be disappointed if you did – there are more thrilling cars out there at the same price-point, but you might not want to live with them every day). For those that didn’t give it a thought, why would you buy a GTI/GTD rather than an S3/M3 if running costs were not a consideration?
I buy my cars to a running price-point. With the excellent residuals and economy that I’m used to (that should be exceeded), the GTD fits perfectly with the budget I have allowed for running a car, I get a lot of car for less money than I might be spending for a lesser car of another marque.
In the past I’ve not found the combined efficiency figures an impossible target – I think I might this time though. The sceptic in me thinks that reported 20% gains in efficiency is a tall order. Energy recuperation via braking accounts for an “up to” 3% saving. Modest 40kg weight savings on the higher models will be negligible (the car is pulling 3% less weight than it used to), faster warming on the 2.0 TDI might see a few percent on my commute if the engine warms up a mile or so quicker into my journey. Can’t see those engine frictional surface changes adding up to the other 10-12% savings.
It wasn’t a deal-breaker that my GTD might not achieve 67mpg given my scepticism – I do expect to be getting 55mpg around the doors and 60mpg on a longer journey though. Unobtainable published economy might be a deal-breaker for someone else though, especially if they’re stretching their budget to buy whatever car they chose. Those figures may be what pushed someone from another marque to a GTI/GTD or what pushed a 170TDI VAG owner to the GTI, figuring that if they get a GTI it’ll be giving as many mpg as they currently get with their MK5/MK6/Leon FR/Scirocco TDI170.

On a “frugal” car that currently costs me £140 a month in Diesel, I choose to think that my fuel bill is significant and worthy of my consideration.
Whey ya bugger! It's finally arrived after an 8 month wait....
MK7 R 5 door, manual, Lapiz Blue, Prets.