Author Topic: Mk4 faster than Mk3,2 and 1 (oh and Mk3 second fastest!)  (Read 16669 times)

Gavv8

  • Guest
Re: Mk4 faster than Mk3,2 and 1 (oh and Mk3 second fastest!)
« Reply #20 on: 17 May 2013, 22:26 »

At least the mk3 isn't a tractor.

Offline Agreeable Slick

  • Global Moderator
  • Serious forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,075
  • Unit
Re: Mk4 faster than Mk3,2 and 1 (oh and Mk3 second fastest!)
« Reply #21 on: 17 May 2013, 22:26 »
Comparing N/A against forced induction. Sums up the study tbh.

Offline Foreveryoungaus16v

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,370
Re: Mk4 faster than Mk3,2 and 1 (oh and Mk3 second fastest!)
« Reply #22 on: 17 May 2013, 22:27 »
I agree Gav.  Mk4 are sh!te.  Will never buy one again

KW V2, TEAM DYNAMICS PRO RACE 1.2, EIBACH ARBS, DS 2500 PADS, BLACK DIAMOND DISCS, LIGHTENED FLYWHEEL, CHIPPED ECU, VIBRA TECHNIC MOUNTS, JETEX DECAT,  FULLY POLYBUSHED
163 BHP (TSR POWER RUN)

Offline dom

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 10,084
  • Back in a Mk4
Re: Mk4 faster than Mk3,2 and 1 (oh and Mk3 second fastest!)
« Reply #23 on: 17 May 2013, 22:27 »
Mk4's have lots of problems. I'd say it's the most unreliable golf of them all.

Mk4 = Utter pants in all but R32 form. Well made though.  Out of all the golfs the Mk4 would be the one I

would avoid.  Sorry.

Ever driven a mapped MK4? Pisses on all mk3's without significant engine work.

Mk4 was as a guess better suited to the track, lets be honest a std mk3 would be all at sea on a track in terms of handling.
Are you serious?....the mk3 is no lotus i'll grant you but the mk4 is a total shambles in the handling dept.

Having owned both standard I have to disagree, they're both as bad as each other. Saying the MK3 handles better than a MK4 is like saying you'd rather take a bath in cow sh!t than horse sh!t.
Nah..sorry but my headlight has never exploded for no reason nor has my mk3 suffered total electrical failure unlike my brothers mk4... i get very tired of seeing the mk3 berated but i'm afraid to say its a much better car than either the mk2 or mk4.... and i'm aware i'll get some flack for that.

I'm not disputing the reliability of the MK4, I was referring to the handling of both cars in standard form.

If you're going to go down that route though I'll leave you with these:




Gavv8

  • Guest
Re: Mk4 faster than Mk3,2 and 1 (oh and Mk3 second fastest!)
« Reply #24 on: 17 May 2013, 22:30 »
Rust can be fixed...inherent crapness can't.

Offline Poached

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: Mk4 faster than Mk3,2 and 1 (oh and Mk3 second fastest!)
« Reply #25 on: 17 May 2013, 22:32 »
Cabriolet Edition:




Gavv8

  • Guest
Re: Mk4 faster than Mk3,2 and 1 (oh and Mk3 second fastest!)
« Reply #26 on: 17 May 2013, 22:34 »
Cabriolet Edition:


Are you Thoms little disciple?

Offline Poached

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: Mk4 faster than Mk3,2 and 1 (oh and Mk3 second fastest!)
« Reply #27 on: 17 May 2013, 22:36 »
I'm just messing around :tongue:

Offline Foreveryoungaus16v

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,370
Re: Mk4 faster than Mk3,2 and 1 (oh and Mk3 second fastest!)
« Reply #28 on: 17 May 2013, 22:39 »
With superb build quality the mk4 was a great ownership proposition but a GTI it was not. Even with a

turbocharged 180bhp under the bonnet, this Golf was simply too heavy and too slow to capture the

imagination. Dull-witted handling didn't help and the Mk4 was a shadow of the original.

KW V2, TEAM DYNAMICS PRO RACE 1.2, EIBACH ARBS, DS 2500 PADS, BLACK DIAMOND DISCS, LIGHTENED FLYWHEEL, CHIPPED ECU, VIBRA TECHNIC MOUNTS, JETEX DECAT,  FULLY POLYBUSHED
163 BHP (TSR POWER RUN)

Gavv8

  • Guest
Re: Mk4 faster than Mk3,2 and 1 (oh and Mk3 second fastest!)
« Reply #29 on: 17 May 2013, 22:42 »
The mk1 was the finest and in campaign spec was ..in my opinion...perfect.