Mk4 was as a guess better suited to the track, lets be honest a std mk3 would be all at sea on a track in terms of handling.
are was talking about speed, mk4 winsor depreciation mk3 winsor rotting mk3 again takes the title
must be hard to take that the golf everyone hates on is quicker then everyone thought, over taken by a tug!
Mk4's have lots of problems. I'd say it's the most unreliable golf of them all. Mk4 = Utter pants in all but R32 form. Well made though. Out of all the golfs the Mk4 would be the one I would avoid. Sorry.
Quote from: Wayne on 17 May 2013, 13:16Mk4 was as a guess better suited to the track, lets be honest a std mk3 would be all at sea on a track in terms of handling.Are you serious?....the mk3 is no lotus i'll grant you but the mk4 is a total shambles in the handling dept.
Quote from: Foreveryoungaus16v on 17 May 2013, 21:51Mk4's have lots of problems. I'd say it's the most unreliable golf of them all. Mk4 = Utter pants in all but R32 form. Well made though. Out of all the golfs the Mk4 would be the one I would avoid. Sorry.Ever driven a mapped MK4? Pisses on all mk3's without significant engine work.Quote from: Gavv8 on 17 May 2013, 21:32Quote from: Wayne on 17 May 2013, 13:16Mk4 was as a guess better suited to the track, lets be honest a std mk3 would be all at sea on a track in terms of handling.Are you serious?....the mk3 is no lotus i'll grant you but the mk4 is a total shambles in the handling dept.Having owned both standard I have to disagree, they're both as bad as each other. Saying the MK3 handles better than a MK4 is like saying you'd rather take a bath in cow sh!t than horse sh!t.