Author Topic: Not happy  (Read 7242 times)

Offline monty9120

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
Re: Not happy
« Reply #10 on: 01 June 2012, 21:27 »
im sure with age they loose bhp. have you taken that into context?

if its been looked after it wont lose that many ponies  :wink:
mine is 14 years old and pretty much same power as the day it left the factory according to logs and rollers

fair enough i did see a test on top gear a few years where the cars were alot lower then the factory.

i cant see with all the pipes. boost turbo on a golf that every single thing is working fine. that they would run the same as standard

its possible maybe the car is down on compression


Offline inggti

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: Not happy
« Reply #11 on: 01 June 2012, 21:29 »
A lace called DG auto tech near Kidderminster did the map. And nick actuator was fine. Chris said even though it's down on power it was smooth getting upto it

Offline inggti

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: Not happy
« Reply #12 on: 01 June 2012, 21:30 »
How would test pressure and how to fix

Offline inggti

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: Not happy
« Reply #13 on: 01 June 2012, 21:52 »
im sure with age they loose bhp. have you taken that into context?

if its been looked after it wont lose that many ponies  :wink:
mine is 14 years old and pretty much same power as the day it left the factory according to logs and rollers

fair enough i did see a test on top gear a few years where the cars were alot lower then the factory.
    But if it was down on compression wouldn't I see other symptoms?????
i cant see with all the pipes. boost turbo on a golf that every single thing is working fine. that they would run the same as standard

its possible maybe the car is down on compression



Offline monty9120

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
Re: Not happy
« Reply #14 on: 01 June 2012, 21:52 »
A lace called DG auto tech near Kidderminster did the map. And nick actuator was fine. Chris said even though it's down on power it was smooth getting upto it

i work in kiddie. if you want me to run mine on the dyno to see the difference from standard

Offline topher

  • Administrator
  • Serious forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,594
  • fully functioning
Re: Not happy
« Reply #15 on: 01 June 2012, 22:56 »
could do with a full diagnostic check (preferably on a standard map) instead of a quick power run but from the limited logging info i did get, load requests being met without loading up the n75 duty cycle, negligible timing correction and close enough maf logs.. i would expect more from a stage 2 agu/k03s combo.

Offline inggti

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: Not happy
« Reply #16 on: 01 June 2012, 23:04 »
could do with a full diagnostic check (preferably on a standard map) instead of a quick power run but from the limited logging info i did get, load requests being met without loading up the n75 duty cycle, negligible timing correction and close enough maf logs.. i would expect more from a stage 2 agu/k03s combo.

This just confused the poo out of me. Sorry for being so thick. Could I have it in dumbass terms. Plz

Offline topher

  • Administrator
  • Serious forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,594
  • fully functioning
Re: Not happy
« Reply #17 on: 01 June 2012, 23:07 »
thats pretty much what me and jody were explaining after the dyno run dude, but it was in answer to nick's question so i had to step in to geek mode there for a sec :nerd:

Offline inggti

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: Not happy
« Reply #18 on: 01 June 2012, 23:13 »
A lace called DG auto tech near Kidderminster did the map. And nick actuator was fine. Chris said even though it's down on power it was smooth getting upto it

i work in kiddie. if you want me to run mine on the dyno to see the difference from standard
The place I had it mapped haven't hot a rolling road so I had to goto midlands vw

Offline inggti

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: Not happy
« Reply #19 on: 01 June 2012, 23:24 »
We're doi go from here??