I was about to query the 50mm choice on the c sensor.... I know some people still favour it, whats ya thinking dubfan?
Sadly it's a seriously short notice trip for three nights, sun chasing, but this does afford me plenty of time to go off shooting whilst the gf sits by the pool.
Mosque's, Souq's, Kasbah's, Medina's and beaches. yum yum!
May go back at some point, quite fancy trying to find that second sun on Tatooine.
My original reason for going for the 50mm f1.8 prime was that it was the cheapest way to get a prime with good glass and a lower f-stop. Also 50mm is equivalent to 80mm on film, which is a good portrait length.
I now have a 28-70mm f2.8 which gives me a 44~112mm 35mm equivalent. This is now my preferred lens for most uses. (Although I'd quite like a 24 or 30mm prime too)
It's all down to what sort of photos you want to take. If you're just starting out, the wide end of your kit lens will suffice for a while, but it obviously only goes to 55mm which leaves your long shots uncovered, hence why I would go for a telephoto before going ultrawide and a reasonable telephoto 70-300 will be cheaper than the ultrawide.
But if you have plenty of money to spare, then sure go get an ultrawide. If you don't use it, you can always sell it.
Personally I'm currently aiming for a 70-210 constant f4 telephoto lens because I'll use that more than a 10-20mm (which is on my list), but it's down to personal preference and the type of photos you take.