As it's my thread, i'm going to have the final word

I believe the big guy only intervened because he thought the old guy was getting out his depth, he would of heard the kid getting abusive so decided to step in.
Now some people clearly believe that he should not of done so. But i would argue that the big guy acted in good faith, and as the kid was refusing to leave, and it was clear that he was a trouble maker, he stepped in before the situation could get any worse.
I think its a shame that some people believe that we should turn a blind eye to this sort of behaviour, ok the kid wasn't violent, but at the time, did anyone know that for sure? there is alot of buts after the event, but hindsight is a great thing.
If only more people would stand up against anti social behaviour in this country, then we would live in a better place.
Even it means some kid is going to get a little shove

Have a good day people
