Author Topic: US to test 13,000mph aircraft  (Read 5117 times)

Offline Agreeable Slick

  • Global Moderator
  • Serious forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,078
  • Unit
Re: US to test 13,000mph aircraft
« Reply #30 on: 12 August 2011, 13:36 »
Lolz at everyone being a Military R&D specialist all of a sudden.

Offline Ant1981

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,601
  • Feed me, prod me
Re: US to test 13,000mph aircraft
« Reply #31 on: 12 August 2011, 13:38 »
Lolz at everyone being a Military R&D specialist all of a sudden.

Lol yes.

And you can tell that's what people here are because of?
80% of your posts are total tripe, as they are mostly replies to sh1te posts created by the morons that, unfortunately this forum attracts.

'02 VW Golf 1.8 GTi Turbo - 186,000 miles
'09 Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R
1990 VW Golf GTi 16V - Gone but not forgotten
Currently considering next car

Offline The Mighty Elvi

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,449
  • I'm better than you today.
Re: US to test 13,000mph aircraft
« Reply #32 on: 12 August 2011, 13:43 »

Ummm Exocet, Falklands War? :rolleyes


Chalk and cheese Len.

The Exocet was designed for hitting small ships.  The Chinese DF-21d is a big can of whoop ass better.

The Exocet is 4.7m long, weighs about 670kg and carries a single 165 kg warhead.  It skims the surface of the sea and has a range of 40 miles.  It would take 10's of these to take down a carrier, but thats provided the launching aircraft/ship get close enough to do so.  :rolleyes:

The DF-21d is a ballistic missile, an ASBM.  Same type of missile as trident.  

It is 10m long, weighs about 14.5 tonnes and carries multiple warheads. It has a range of 900 miles. Unlike the Exocet, it is land launched and goes up into the atmosphere, before descending onto target.  Even the US hasn't got a guidance system sophisticated enough to do this, but apparently the Chinese have.

Now that's a big can of whoop ass right there.




Offline Horney

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 10,782
  • Racing, Trackdays, Starwars.
Re: US to test 13,000mph aircraft
« Reply #33 on: 12 August 2011, 13:43 »
I'm putting on my tin foil hat, it's all aliens I tell thee.

Offline VR6_Wherry

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,940
Re: US to test 13,000mph aircraft
« Reply #34 on: 12 August 2011, 13:47 »
I'm putting on my tin foil hat, it's all aliens I tell thee.

Only sensible thing that has bee said in this thread!

Offline Ant1981

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,601
  • Feed me, prod me
Re: US to test 13,000mph aircraft
« Reply #35 on: 12 August 2011, 13:49 »
I'm putting on my tin foil hat, it's all aliens I tell thee.

Only sensible thing that has bee said in this thread!

You military r&d experts!  :shocked:
80% of your posts are total tripe, as they are mostly replies to sh1te posts created by the morons that, unfortunately this forum attracts.

'02 VW Golf 1.8 GTi Turbo - 186,000 miles
'09 Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R
1990 VW Golf GTi 16V - Gone but not forgotten
Currently considering next car

Offline Len

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 16,298
  • Guardian of the Seas, Protector of Waves
Re: US to test 13,000mph aircraft
« Reply #36 on: 12 August 2011, 14:02 »

Ummm Exocet, Falklands War? :rolleyes


Chalk and cheese Len.

The Exocet was designed for hitting small ships.  The Chinese DF-21d is a big can of whoop ass better.

The Exocet is 4.7m long, weighs about 670kg and carries a single 165 kg warhead.  It skims the surface of the sea and has a range of 40 miles.  It would take 10's of these to take down a carrier, but thats provided the launching aircraft/ship get close enough to do so.  :rolleyes:

The DF-21d is a ballistic missile, an ASBM.  Same type of missile as trident.  

It is 10m long, weighs about 14.5 tonnes and carries multiple warheads. It has a range of 900 miles. Unlike the Exocet, it is land launched and goes up into the atmosphere, before descending onto target.  Even the US hasn't got a guidance system sophisticated enough to do this, but apparently the Chinese have.

Now that's a big can of whoop ass right there.





Without checking HMS Sheffield I think it was wasnt exactly a small ship!
Not quite but nearly as big as a modern aircraft carrier!
Mystic Blue Mk3 16v + Black Mk5 Gti 05 plate + Peugeot 405 Mi16

www.sas.org.uk
www.the-ace.org.uk

Offline Seanl

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,561
Re: US to test 13,000mph aircraft
« Reply #37 on: 12 August 2011, 14:04 »
Yeah ok was using my phone! I am military by the way, and a weapon engineer, so I know a little more than most.  :tongue:
The size of exocet is not all that, same as Harpoon, designed for the same thing pretty much, with harpoon having a range a little more. (70 - 120 miles dependant on movement whilst in the air. (It turns a pre-programmed co-ordinates before coming onto the contact from whichever side or from above). Trident is bigger but again, a single missile wont sink a carrier. None of these would, but the fires/floods/damage they caused by them can. A hole in the side of a ship with an explosion contained in a smallish area (all doors and hatches would be closed if in any situation where they are likely to be fired at you), is not gonna sink a ship, let alone an aircraft carrier. Loss of salt water fire main, with raging fires will though. And anymore than 1 missile would be too much also. Its actually quite difficult to get through with one or two missiles in a reasonably modern warship, with Chaff - no not chuff, DLB (acronym for a big radar reflective orange ball), and Phalanx or goalkeeper (phalanx being an american designed 6 barrel, radar aided self defence gun, capable of 3700 rounds per minute. Goalkeeper a Dutch designed gun of the same thing with 7 barrels, and is more intelligent. Can track up to 20 targets simultaniously, and prioritise which will hit first, second, third etc and take them out with 3 second bursts of 4200 rounds of 30mm per minute. (70 per second). Thats a Feck load of lead in the way! Oh and there is also a 4.5 inch Gun, seawolf, seadart, and seaviper depending on type of ship, as well as miniguns, and GPMGs, 20mm or 30mm gatling guns on the upperdeck. 4.5 is quite accurate, directed by geopod which manually tracks incoming targets by sight during the day, or by IR at night. People on the upperdeck with the guns are obviously pretty unlikely to hit a missile coming directly at you at mach 1,2,3 etc, but may get lucky, although the rate of fire of the minigun is pretty impressive also. (cant remember the exact rate of fire, something around 2k rounds per minute I think).
« Last Edit: 13 August 2011, 12:11 by Seanl »
Classic Green Corrado VR6 Storm | Jetex Cat back | BMC CDA | VT mounts | Bilstein B12 | 288mm front brakes | Mk4 rear brakes | Goodridge braided hoses | BBS RX228s | Shortshifter | Lupo wipers | Uprated headlight loom | All red rears | Refreshed leather | Fresh paint |

Offline Agreeable Slick

  • Global Moderator
  • Serious forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 7,078
  • Unit
Re: US to test 13,000mph aircraft
« Reply #38 on: 12 August 2011, 14:07 »
Lolz at everyone being a Military R&D specialist all of a sudden.

Lol yes.

And you can tell that's what people here are because of?


Offline Ant1981

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,601
  • Feed me, prod me
Re: US to test 13,000mph aircraft
« Reply #39 on: 12 August 2011, 14:08 »
An armourer isn't an engineer  :tongue:
80% of your posts are total tripe, as they are mostly replies to sh1te posts created by the morons that, unfortunately this forum attracts.

'02 VW Golf 1.8 GTi Turbo - 186,000 miles
'09 Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R
1990 VW Golf GTi 16V - Gone but not forgotten
Currently considering next car