Author Topic: A car to match my Mk2  (Read 3051 times)

Offline Haribo!

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,327
A car to match my Mk2
« on: 21 March 2011, 22:29 »
I love golfs, but I kinda want a carrado...  :laugh:

A worry of mine if losing power as its a bigger car, how big an engine should I be aiming for to match the performance?  Handling isnt too important to me cause I really dont thrash around anymore, I just like to be able to pull away and over take quickly when I need to.

Offline Wayne

  • Sir Postalot
  • *
  • Posts: 32,051
Re: A car to match my Mk2
« Reply #1 on: 21 March 2011, 23:18 »
A Corrado is not any bigger than a mk2 in real terms, based on the same floorpan.

2.0 16V is a good all round choice.

Offline Sam

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,189
  • Sam I am
Re: A car to match my Mk2
« Reply #2 on: 22 March 2011, 00:08 »
or stage 4 g60?


The entire world is a Money Pit, you just have to pick yours.

Offline delirical

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 212
  • Like a g60
Re: A car to match my Mk2
« Reply #3 on: 22 March 2011, 08:20 »
Yea 2.0 16v or G60 im sure the corrado would be a fair bit heavier than a mk2, i could be wrong though.

Offline Haribo!

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,327
Re: A car to match my Mk2
« Reply #4 on: 22 March 2011, 09:25 »
yeh sorry, bigger wasnt the best word to use, I mean heavier, ive seen a 2lt 8v, think thatl be noticably slower or will the slightly larger engine make up for the extra weight?

Offline Horney

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 10,782
  • Racing, Trackdays, Starwars.
Re: A car to match my Mk2
« Reply #5 on: 22 March 2011, 09:27 »
2.0 8v is arse frankly. Corrado is a bit heavier than the MKII but handles sooo much better and the driving position is like a well worn slipper.

Er anyway. 2.0 16v with KR cams as a minimum, g60 or VR6 are the better ones though.

Nick

Offline Wayne

  • Sir Postalot
  • *
  • Posts: 32,051
Re: A car to match my Mk2
« Reply #6 on: 22 March 2011, 09:58 »
G60 has too many issues with the superchager to be considered a day to day choice, VR is really nice but think of the fuel bills.

Offline Horney

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 10,782
  • Racing, Trackdays, Starwars.
Re: A car to match my Mk2
« Reply #7 on: 22 March 2011, 10:03 »
G60 has too many issues with the superchager to be considered a day to day choice, VR is really nice but think of the fuel bills.

Really? I know a few peeps who've run standard G60's (and G40 polos) as dailys just fine. It's only when you start pushing them with smaller pulleys etc that they get a bit un reliable.

Nick

Offline Sam

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,189
  • Sam I am
Re: A car to match my Mk2
« Reply #8 on: 22 March 2011, 10:13 »
Was gonna say, what the hell are you talking about wayne? Sure you have to re-build them every 60,000 miles but a stage 4 re-build is only £350 if that. I say 'only' as having access to a supercharger for 60,000 miles is worth that price  :grin:


The entire world is a Money Pit, you just have to pick yours.

Offline Wayne

  • Sir Postalot
  • *
  • Posts: 32,051
Re: A car to match my Mk2
« Reply #9 on: 22 March 2011, 10:48 »
G60 has too many issues with the superchager to be considered a day to day choice, VR is really nice but think of the fuel bills.

Really? I know a few peeps who've run standard G60's (and G40 polos) as dailys just fine. It's only when you start pushing them with smaller pulleys etc that they get a bit un reliable.

Nick

Some can be ok but they still suffer lip seal problems and you then loose boost etc, yes you can rebuild them but I still think the 16v is still the best all round choice.

Also the standard G60 is only 24bhp more.
« Last Edit: 22 March 2011, 10:52 by Wayne »