Author Topic: Supercharger........  (Read 4036 times)

Offline Wayne

  • Sir Postalot
  • *
  • Posts: 32,051
Re: Supercharger........
« Reply #10 on: 26 July 2010, 15:39 »
volvo, saab and porsche all had kjet turbo engines, i suppose they just made the flap stiffer  :grin:

They also had a very early / primitive form of knock control.

Offline LazyLunatic

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,153
  • MK3 20VT Project
Re: Supercharger........
« Reply #11 on: 26 July 2010, 15:43 »
apparently also used in VW, Merc, Ferrari and Ford!

Offline Wayne

  • Sir Postalot
  • *
  • Posts: 32,051
Re: Supercharger........
« Reply #12 on: 26 July 2010, 15:47 »
apparently also used in VW, Merc, Ferrari and Ford!

Yes they did but k jet does not work very well with a turbo or supercharger, you need a knock sensor for safety and also some form of boost control.


K-Jetronic (1973–1988)Mechanical fuel injection. The 'K' stands for German: "Kontinuierlich", meaning continuous. This is different from pulsed injection systems, in that the fuel flows continuously from all injectors, whilst the fuel pump pressurises the fuel up to approximately 5 bar (72.5 psi). The air that is taken in is also weighed - to determine the amount of fuel to inject. Commonly called 'Continuous Injection System' (CIS) in the USA. This system has no lambda loop or lambda control. K-Jetronic debuted in the 1973.5 Porsche 911T, and was later installed into a number of Porsche, Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen Group, Ferrari, BMW, Volvo, Saab and Ford automobiles.

Offline LazyLunatic

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,153
  • MK3 20VT Project
Re: Supercharger........
« Reply #13 on: 26 July 2010, 15:57 »
apparently also used in VW, Merc, Ferrari and Ford!

Yes they did but k jet does not work very well with a turbo or supercharger, you need a knock sensor for safety and also some form of boost control.


K-Jetronic (1973–1988)Mechanical fuel injection. The 'K' stands for German: "Kontinuierlich", meaning continuous. This is different from pulsed injection systems, in that the fuel flows continuously from all injectors, whilst the fuel pump pressurises the fuel up to approximately 5 bar (72.5 psi). The air that is taken in is also weighed - to determine the amount of fuel to inject. Commonly called 'Continuous Injection System' (CIS) in the USA. This system has no lambda loop or lambda control. K-Jetronic debuted in the 1973.5 Porsche 911T, and was later installed into a number of Porsche, Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen Group, Ferrari, BMW, Volvo, Saab and Ford automobiles.

Thats it! Wikipedia :D

this is true, if it was any good, all those company's would use it today.

Offline Wayne

  • Sir Postalot
  • *
  • Posts: 32,051
Re: Supercharger........
« Reply #14 on: 26 July 2010, 15:59 »
apparently also used in VW, Merc, Ferrari and Ford!

Yes they did but k jet does not work very well with a turbo or supercharger, you need a knock sensor for safety and also some form of boost control.


K-Jetronic (1973–1988)Mechanical fuel injection. The 'K' stands for German: "Kontinuierlich", meaning continuous. This is different from pulsed injection systems, in that the fuel flows continuously from all injectors, whilst the fuel pump pressurises the fuel up to approximately 5 bar (72.5 psi). The air that is taken in is also weighed - to determine the amount of fuel to inject. Commonly called 'Continuous Injection System' (CIS) in the USA. This system has no lambda loop or lambda control. K-Jetronic debuted in the 1973.5 Porsche 911T, and was later installed into a number of Porsche, Mercedes-Benz, Volkswagen Group, Ferrari, BMW, Volvo, Saab and Ford automobiles.

Thats it! Wikipedia :D

this is true, if it was any good, all those company's would use it today.

K jet was ok for the time but things have moved on.

Offline danny_p

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,646
Re: Supercharger........
« Reply #15 on: 26 July 2010, 19:52 »
1.6 will take boost

1.6 will take supriseing amount of boost

1.6 easy boost


easy oldskool  way is to,  strap the airflow assister straight ontop of the inlet manifold and strap a webber to the intake of the charger.

it'll do about 150 bhp before it goes bang


all the VW's have gone bar 1.

Offline emery1990

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,196
Re: Supercharger........
« Reply #16 on: 26 July 2010, 20:23 »
Is much easier to supercharge and engine rather than turbo it?

Offline Wayne

  • Sir Postalot
  • *
  • Posts: 32,051
Re: Supercharger........
« Reply #17 on: 26 July 2010, 21:09 »
Is much easier to supercharge and engine rather than turbo it?

Not really.

Offline danny_p

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,646
Re: Supercharger........
« Reply #18 on: 27 July 2010, 01:18 »
imo it massivly depends on the engine really.

some lend themselves to supercharging some lend themselves to turbo, on other ether is a battel
all the VW's have gone bar 1.

Offline Rmachines

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,901
  • Passat 20vT Estate and Candy White MK3 1.8 GL
Re: Supercharger........
« Reply #19 on: 29 July 2010, 17:09 »
The old RS turbo escorts had K-jet and were turbo, but..  Rarther than K-Jetronic, it was KE-Jetronic,  it was still mechanical injection but was helped along with an electronic igntion system.  But none the less it did use a flappy flap meter, lol all be it upside down, So yes it can be done but No just dont even bother!   :smiley:
10 golfs and counting! 

Engine cranes = the ultimate tool to test the tensile strength of Everything you didn't disconnect!