Quote from: pom on 14 April 2010, 16:11comparing the 170 DSG golf against the 170 S-Tronic audi. No idea why the golf is slower.But comparing the petrol models the golf gti is a heck of a lot slower at 6.9 compared to 5.6 for the A3 Quattro. In fairness though the A3 squeezes a lot more power from the engine.PomPom, with 4WD [Quattro] it's possible to get more power down on the tarmac without overworking the TCS or spinning the wheels; that's why the Golf R can handle 275PS, which is produced from the same 2.0TSI engine that is in the GTI with 210PS. It's also why the A3 Quattro can be given more horses.
comparing the 170 DSG golf against the 170 S-Tronic audi. No idea why the golf is slower.But comparing the petrol models the golf gti is a heck of a lot slower at 6.9 compared to 5.6 for the A3 Quattro. In fairness though the A3 squeezes a lot more power from the engine.Pom
Quote from: avalon on 14 April 2010, 16:59Pom - you don't say what you were ordering - i'm assuming a GTi GT TDI 170 DSG.
Pom - you don't say what you were ordering - i'm assuming a GTi
A MK5 engine in a MK6
Quote from: AlanD on 15 April 2010, 13:03A MK5 engine in a MK6 old news alan
Quote from: GtiJames on 15 April 2010, 13:34Quote from: AlanD on 15 April 2010, 13:03A MK5 engine in a MK6 old news alan Should have seen the sh!t storm it caused when this info first came out.
for the modern gti owner - middle class accountant types who buy the golf because it makes them feel less of a geek and to impress the neighbours but winces at having to put super unleaded in because they read somewhere in the Sunday times that it gave no peformance benefit on a Citroen Picasso...hence they developed the 2.0tsi
Hold on, did someone say the A3 is faster than the GTI ? I aint reading 3 pages again just to confirm.If someone did say that then I'll get the GTD boys round to give your A3 a good hammering as we know who's top dog around here.