Author Topic: 16v POWER  (Read 26709 times)

Offline laurenceyon

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
Re: 16v POWER
« Reply #20 on: 17 March 2010, 15:11 »
There was no text missing,
I was just stating that it is totally awesome power after 4500rpm,
I raced my mate in his 8valve the other day and he was just about with me up until i went past the 4500rpm mark, And then i just left him for dead,
These 16valvers are just way faster than the 8valvers,,

YESSS Your right, I thought this was true until the unspeakable comment my mate left after driving my 16V: "It's quick but your Red 8v was quicker."

Sh1t....

 
Hi my name is Laurence, I'm very much like you. Only better.

Offline peaky83

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 278
Re: 16v POWER
« Reply #21 on: 17 March 2010, 15:18 »
Your mate has his head screwed on! 8V POWER!

Offline russ-vdub

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,350
  • Once a Dub, Always a Dub
Re: 16v POWER
« Reply #22 on: 17 March 2010, 15:27 »
This is such a stupid post. If your 16V is flat all the way up until 4500rpm then its not setup right.

BOAST FAIL

Get it setup properly you retard before saying how amazing your 16v is!

Offline peaky83

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 278
Re: 16v POWER
« Reply #23 on: 17 March 2010, 15:56 »
This is such a stupid post. If your 16V is flat all the way up until 4500rpm then its not setup right.

BOAST FAIL

Get it setup properly you retard before saying how amazing your 16v is!

Here here!  :wink:

Offline beechymonza

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 680
  • mad beech
Re: 16v POWER
« Reply #24 on: 17 March 2010, 18:43 »
This is such a stupid post. If your 16V is flat all the way up until 4500rpm then its not setup right.

BOAST FAIL

Get it setup properly you retard before saying how amazing your 16v is!
If its that stupid why did you waste your ever so much precious time and comment, you should of kept your stupid nose out,
BOAST THICKO

No guts No glory,

Offline peaky83

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 278
Re: 16v POWER
« Reply #25 on: 17 March 2010, 19:07 »
Was that not a joke?

Offline beechymonza

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 680
  • mad beech
Re: 16v POWER
« Reply #26 on: 17 March 2010, 19:16 »
The whole thread was based as a bit of fun,  :grin:And i think most people realised this,  :rolleyes:
But when someone pops up and uses the word RETARD and says the thread is useless then obviously he didnt see the funny side of it did he,
Somepeople are just 2 serious on here,
I wasnt asking for advice or giving any advice i was just proposing that my car was AWESOME after 4500rpm, And i stick by that lol
No guts No glory,

Offline bodga

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 339
  • F reg GTI 16v
Re: 16v POWER
« Reply #27 on: 17 March 2010, 20:48 »
The whole thread was based as a bit of fun,  :grin:And i think most people realised this,  :rolleyes:
But when someone pops up and uses the word RETARD and says the thread is useless then obviously he didnt see the funny side of it did he,
Somepeople are just 2 serious on here,
I wasnt asking for advice or giving any advice i was just proposing that my car was AWESOME after 4500rpm, And i stick by that lol


+1 chill! :grin:

Another Q: Is there much difference performance wise between 8v digi and 8v K-jet? Any 1 got a bhp torque chart? etc

bet i will be sent to zee cooler! for not using the search function  :rolleyes:

Offline peaky83

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 278
Re: 16v POWER
« Reply #28 on: 17 March 2010, 21:02 »
Mines an 8v digifant PB engine code. Had it on a rolling road last year. It's completely standard except the pipercross panel filter and it's running 115.9 bhp with 132 ft/lbs torque got the print out somewhere... Hope that hlelps... Anyone done the same with a k-jet?

Offline Mew

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,589
Re: 16v POWER
« Reply #29 on: 17 March 2010, 21:21 »
Standard 8v k-jet running "dangerously lean" put out 93.6 bhp and 98.2 foot-pounds at the wheels.

From my experience the digifant engine feels torquier than the k-jet, but the k-jet definitely feels quicker.....