I meant to mention that I have been getting these funny ideas, must be due to the heat and overexposure to the sun!

I'm thinking about engine choices and the relative merits of diesel, petrol, 4 cylinders, 5 cylinders, six cylinders, forced induction, etc, etc, etc. It struck me that light-weight was the first prioroty and then power all predicated on cost. Now I guess that the turbo-charged 20v would be the obvious choice, but that is quite expensive, so I was thinking about v6's. The VR6 is not as light as it might be and so someone suggested the Alfa V6 as it is light, powerful and very cheap. I have been looking and it should fit and even comes in FWD guise in the 164 & 166. The wheelbase of the 164 is 2660mm and the 166 2720mm so a little longer than the Mk3 at 2474mm. I have used the Mk3 wheelbase as I have the parts to wide track my Mk 2. Is this a really bad idea or does it have some merit? I mean they soiund brilliant, look fabulous and should make for a lively Mk2 that's a bit different.
I think I'm either a genius or absolutally daft, but which is it?
Answers on a postcard..........