A quick comparison shows that the ED30 volume is quite sparse compared with even the S3 cooler let alone the THS one.

Although the ED30 outlet appears better than the S3 version it is restricted after the connector down to under 40mm. The THS is straight in to the cooler at 57mm.
Do I see an error in your calculations? Whilst you have included the relevent 'OEM' sited coolers, what about the Forge unit? Because, some peeps (me included) have the S3 cooler in the OEM site, along with the Forge. How does this compare with just the THS cooler.

Secondly, how does the THS address the longstanding issue of the siting of the OEM cooler from heat-soak from the mega-hot coolant rad, and the equally hot air con condensor? 
Oh, and to be really pedant - shouldn't 'cubic area' better be described as 'volume'?

Yes, you are right Sean, the combo of the Forge and an S3 would give a larger volume than the THS unit on it's own
It was the flow rate that I was more interested in. The THS unit means that I can do away with the Forge front mounted IC and have the hot weather climate radiator added as well.
OK, I sort of see your logic - but I still don't see how ditching the Forge can be fully compensated for when just using a cooler in the OEM position.

And anyway, wasn't the Forge proven to have a vastly improved flow rate too?

This is added to Regal's car and does help cool the engine a little better.
But in the UK, acutal cooling of the engine hasn't been an issue! Or have I missed sommat?
And how is the flow of coolant to the additional hot climate rad controlled? On Audis, they are only flowed into when the ECU actually opens up separate thermostats - but I didn't think the Golf ECU supported that method?
DomT on the "other" forum has done some extensive logging and found that the cooler maintains a good 7 to 9 degrees above ambient even when driving hard as well as a flow rate of over 480g/s which is more than enough to cool the car at 450bhp levels. 
Hmmmm . . . but I'm still having difficulty accepting that
just the THS cooler can flow better than the S3 and Forge. And I am still fairly adamant that the OEM mount cooler location (be that the standard plastic one, the S3, or the THS) can not overcome the inherent issues of heatsoak from the air con condensor, and the main coolant rad. Even IF the hot clime rad can be flowed at max coolant volume, it will never be more efficient than the main central coolant rad - and therefore, the main coolant rad will still be dissipating the lions share of the engines heat - and some of that heat WILL radiate and conduct into the THS - irrespective of its flow rate. It is this specific area which the Forge is able to 100% overcome - but standard location coolers cant.!!
You are right about the volume thing, but it wasn't my original table 
Feeble excuse, John!
