GolfGTIforum.co.uk

Model specific boards => Golf mk4 => Topic started by: ELCAP1TAN0 on 10 October 2011, 18:59

Title: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: ELCAP1TAN0 on 10 October 2011, 18:59
Right I have a 99 1.8t. I've not driven the 2.8 but fancy giving it a whirl. May sound silly but is fuel efficiency horrendously different. My car is standard except from a piper cross incuction and it's been lowered by about 35mm with 18" alloys. Is it a noticeable different drive? I like the idea of 4wd too. I've scouted this forum every now and again but there seems to be many more of you guys with a 1.8t to anything else rather than a 2.8v6.
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: johnnyvr6 on 10 October 2011, 19:01
i would get the v6 4mo they are miles better than the 1.8t,plus 4wd good for snow :grin:
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: jamie16v on 10 October 2011, 19:06
i`ve considered putting the running gear from a  4mo/r32 on my 1.8t, would mean changing the boot floor pan though and possibly fuel tank. too expensive so sticking with fwd. the plus side is less transmission loss :undecided:
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: bricey on 10 October 2011, 19:18
so what are thinking buying a 4mo
ill tell you fuel effiency is crap,suspension will need changing bit bouncy,r32 springs is a good way to go.
4wd is not perminant only when is needs it,
and in my own oppinion its underpowered for a 2.8v6
but i wouldnt change it for the world.
im back in norwich at the end of november visiting parents and family ill give you a shout :smiley:
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: damien010685 on 10 October 2011, 19:28
Double your fuel costs!! Sounds awesome like very good in sh!t weather All your tuning Lads will tell you stick to the 1.8t of course as getting more power out a 4mo isnt cheap and as bricey said standard suspension on the 4mo is bouncy as hell! I love the 4mo though and you can pick up a 4mo pretty cheap as people dont like the fuel costs
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: ELCAP1TAN0 on 10 October 2011, 19:40
Okey dole. I mean I have no intention of remapping my car. The big one for me would have been the 4wd as where i live when it snows it's a b!tch. but from the sounds of it the 1.8t is a better car?
Thatd be great bricey. I know fuel economy would go down, but is it that bad?
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: damien010685 on 10 October 2011, 19:45
Well no the 4mo would be better in bad weather overall i prefer the 4mo i love the noise and i dont care about fuel if you want MPG then the 1.8t is the better option
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: damien010685 on 10 October 2011, 19:46
And fuel is crap you will get between 17 and 22mpg in town pending on how u drive and on a run between 25 and 30 again depends on how u drive
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: dom on 10 October 2011, 19:48
And fuel is crap you will get between 17 and 22mpg in town pending on how u drive and on a run between 25 and 30 again depends on how u drive

Tbh I don't see much more than that in my 1.8t :undecided:
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: damien010685 on 10 October 2011, 19:50
Well u must be thrashing it then my mates 1.8t gets about 25 to 30 around town and 35 to 45 mpg on long runs
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: daz veedub on 10 October 2011, 19:52
mines about 26 around town dropped to around 18/19 when giving her some mid 30s on long runs
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: bricey on 10 October 2011, 19:57
on a typical trip to norwich i cant just about nudge 32mpg that is being very gentle with the throttle.
great car though
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: barrym381 on 10 October 2011, 20:05
dont see much diffrence in fuel between my 4:mo an 1.8t on the motorway feels like your revvin the nuts out the 1.8t but the 4:mo is so much better for it but 1.8t is better about town
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: Wayne on 10 October 2011, 20:42
And fuel is crap you will get between 17 and 22mpg in town pending on how u drive and on a run between 25 and 30 again depends on how u drive

Tbh I don't see much more than that in my 1.8t :undecided:

Same as mine, lucky to get much moreĀ  :smiley:
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: damien010685 on 10 October 2011, 20:48
Hmmm i thought the 1.8t was good on fuel? O well makes me even happier i have a 4mo cos The note is worth it :D
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: Wayne on 10 October 2011, 20:52
Hmmm i thought the 1.8t was good on fuel? O well makes me even happier i have a 4mo cos The note is worth it :D

Mine over 80ltrs of fuel averaged out @ 28.6mpg (mixed driving, mostly short runs) and that was not doing it on the mfa readings but working it out with miles covered etc.
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: jamie16v on 10 October 2011, 21:18
short runs are where all your fuel is going. i used to drive 1.5miles to work every day and was only getting about 22mpg, go for a long motorway drive and i would see about 45mpg driven sensibly.
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: tokemk4gti.t on 10 October 2011, 21:47
since i had mine remapped im gettin 39-40mpg on the motorway doin 80/85 round town im on 34 give it some and im gettin 28 thats proper bootin it aswell:-/ lol
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: Wayne on 10 October 2011, 23:55
short runs are where all your fuel is going. i used to drive 1.5miles to work every day and was only getting about 22mpg, go for a long motorway drive and i would see about 45mpg driven sensibly.

Doubt that tbh, book figure is around 37/38 for a 1.8t, most I have ever seen on a run is 35.6.
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: Dave_IOW on 11 October 2011, 00:03
short runs are where all your fuel is going. i used to drive 1.5miles to work every day and was only getting about 22mpg, go for a long motorway drive and i would see about 45mpg driven sensibly.

Doubt that tbh, book figure is around 37/38 for a 1.8t, most I have ever seen on a run is 35.6.

Sensible run i can see 40-42 with a feather-weight foot and thats on the IOW. Boring as hell though.

Mine goes lower than 15 when im doing my bit to fcuk that O zone layer up  :cool:
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: Wayne on 11 October 2011, 00:06

Mine goes lower than 15 when im doing my bit to fcuk that O zone layer up  :cool:


:grin: I have seen mine drop to 12 when having a play :smiley:
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: barrym381 on 11 October 2011, 00:16

Mine goes lower than 15 when im doing my bit to fcuk that O zone layer up  :cool:


:grin: I have seen mine drop to 12 when having a play :smiley:
:grin: :grin: thats how mine always comes back empty after the wifes been using mine
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: Sammie-GTI on 11 October 2011, 01:02
if your bothered about fuel consumption get a dirty diesel if not then a 1.8t is the way to go
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: bricey on 11 October 2011, 07:35

Mine goes lower than 15 when im doing my bit to fcuk that O zone layer up  :cool:


:grin: I have seen mine drop to 12 when having a play :smiley:
hooning around i see 7mpg :undecided: :laugh:
Title: Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
Post by: Sammie-GTI on 11 October 2011, 14:06
it wasn't you who asked the question it was ELCAP1TAN0