Author Topic: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6  (Read 3633 times)

Offline ELCAP1TAN0

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 56
1.8t vs 2.8 v6
« on: 10 October 2011, 18:59 »
Right I have a 99 1.8t. I've not driven the 2.8 but fancy giving it a whirl. May sound silly but is fuel efficiency horrendously different. My car is standard except from a piper cross incuction and it's been lowered by about 35mm with 18" alloys. Is it a noticeable different drive? I like the idea of 4wd too. I've scouted this forum every now and again but there seems to be many more of you guys with a 1.8t to anything else rather than a 2.8v6.

Offline johnnyvr6

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 447
  • golf v6 4motion soon to be 1.8t'd
Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
« Reply #1 on: 10 October 2011, 19:01 »
i would get the v6 4mo they are miles better than the 1.8t,plus 4wd good for snow :grin:

jamie16v

  • Guest
Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
« Reply #2 on: 10 October 2011, 19:06 »
i`ve considered putting the running gear from a  4mo/r32 on my 1.8t, would mean changing the boot floor pan though and possibly fuel tank. too expensive so sticking with fwd. the plus side is less transmission loss :undecided:

Offline bricey

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
  • One of a few with a PROPER engine
Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
« Reply #3 on: 10 October 2011, 19:18 »
so what are thinking buying a 4mo
ill tell you fuel effiency is crap,suspension will need changing bit bouncy,r32 springs is a good way to go.
4wd is not perminant only when is needs it,
and in my own oppinion its underpowered for a 2.8v6
but i wouldnt change it for the world.
im back in norwich at the end of november visiting parents and family ill give you a shout :smiley:
DOLPHIN TRAINER

Offline damien010685

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,513
Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
« Reply #4 on: 10 October 2011, 19:28 »
Double your fuel costs!! Sounds awesome like very good in sh!t weather All your tuning Lads will tell you stick to the 1.8t of course as getting more power out a 4mo isnt cheap and as bricey said standard suspension on the 4mo is bouncy as hell! I love the 4mo though and you can pick up a 4mo pretty cheap as people dont like the fuel costs

Offline ELCAP1TAN0

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
« Reply #5 on: 10 October 2011, 19:40 »
Okey dole. I mean I have no intention of remapping my car. The big one for me would have been the 4wd as where i live when it snows it's a b!tch. but from the sounds of it the 1.8t is a better car?
Thatd be great bricey. I know fuel economy would go down, but is it that bad?
« Last Edit: 10 October 2011, 19:42 by ELCAP1TAN0 »

Offline damien010685

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,513
Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
« Reply #6 on: 10 October 2011, 19:45 »
Well no the 4mo would be better in bad weather overall i prefer the 4mo i love the noise and i dont care about fuel if you want MPG then the 1.8t is the better option

Offline damien010685

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,513
Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
« Reply #7 on: 10 October 2011, 19:46 »
And fuel is crap you will get between 17 and 22mpg in town pending on how u drive and on a run between 25 and 30 again depends on how u drive

Offline dom

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 10,083
  • Back in a Mk4
Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
« Reply #8 on: 10 October 2011, 19:48 »
And fuel is crap you will get between 17 and 22mpg in town pending on how u drive and on a run between 25 and 30 again depends on how u drive

Tbh I don't see much more than that in my 1.8t :undecided:

Offline damien010685

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,513
Re: 1.8t vs 2.8 v6
« Reply #9 on: 10 October 2011, 19:50 »
Well u must be thrashing it then my mates 1.8t gets about 25 to 30 around town and 35 to 45 mpg on long runs