Results from JKM Rolling road day.

[vRStu]

It was around the 260 mark last time I ran it.

[vRStu]

In case you are confused it's 264 not 164 as written on the other thread.  It's petrol not oil.

[Vtec Abuser]

I see Bluefin are getting great results again...  
Shame there was no Revo/GIAC Ed30's there really to compare..
Think i'd be a little p*ssed off if I was RR.. 

[182_blue]

It was around the 260 mark last time I ran it.

do you have a remap ? , can't tell from your sig LOL

[vRStu]

Four letters, begins with R and ends in O.

[SteveP]

I am probably opening a can of worms again, but today (for me anyway) proved 100% that the figures quoted by most tuners and those that have been seen on some RR's elsewhere are way over the top.

The stock MK5's (both normal and ED30) that ran today all showed within a few BHP the stock quoted figures, take Golfgirls results and compare these to another RR session she was on recently.

Anyway for just the remap and filter I have I was very pleased with the true results I saw today. 

[Vtec Abuser]

I am probably opening a can of worms again, but today (for me anyway) proved 100% that the figures quoted by most tuners and those that have been seen on some RR's elsewhere are way over the top.

The stock MK5's (both normal and ED30) that ran today all showed within a few BHP the stock quoted figures, take Golfgirls results and compare these to another RR session she was on recently.

Anyway for just the remap and filter I have I was very pleased with the true results I saw today. 

No offence mate, but why is it 100% PROVEN??? 
I understand JKM are a very proffesional outfit and stock cars seem to be pulling accurate figures. But there can be more to than that.. For some reason, modded cars and JKM's rollers don't seem to get on by the looks of things..
I mean 250bhp from a mapped ED30 is just laughable and i'm sure that Shaun (182 Blue) will be the first to say that his must be pulling more than that, as he had a fairly modded ST before hand and has a good comparison to go on..

[182_blue]

I see Bluefin are getting great results again...  
Shame there was no Revo/GIAC Ed30's there really to compare..
Think i'd be a little p*ssed off if I was RR.. 

dunno, is 271 bhp bad ?

[182_blue]

i have to say i had a 280+ bhp car before and the ED30 is most deffinately quicker, so its all a bit odd, wonder if the manual ed30's do better on the RR ?, im tempted to get Revo but im not sure i will notice the difference

I am probably opening a can of worms again, but today (for me anyway) proved 100% that the figures quoted by most tuners and those that have been seen on some RR's elsewhere are way over the top.

The stock MK5's (both normal and ED30) that ran today all showed within a few BHP the stock quoted figures, take Golfgirls results and compare these to another RR session she was on recently.

Anyway for just the remap and filter I have I was very pleased with the true results I saw today. 

No offence mate, but why is it 100% PROVEN??? 
I understand JKM are a very proffesional outfit and stock cars seem to be pulling accurate figures. But there can be more to than that.. For some reason, modded cars and JKM's rollers don't seem to get on by the looks of things..
I mean 250bhp from a mapped ED30 is just laughable and i'm sure that Shaun (182 Blue) will be the first to say that his must be pulling more than that, as he had a fairly modded ST before hand and has a good comparison to go on..

[Vtec Abuser]

I see Bluefin are getting great results again...  
Shame there was no Revo/GIAC Ed30's there really to compare..
Think i'd be a little p*ssed off if I was RR.. 

dunno, is 271 bhp bad ?

That's with Milltek too mate. The other one got 252....