Just had my R32 Dyno'd... 263bhp & 253lb/ft STOCK (graph inside)

[davefish]

Thanks for the comments guys. I was shocked as the run figures were coming up on the monitor. All runs were 260 or higher. Well chuffed ;-)

[john_o]

I'd be well chuffed too
to be honest if it was anything other than a dynodynamics road I would be calling them into question too 
The torque figures do seem turbo like  , sticks 2 fingers to us ED30 guys 

Rev limit on R32 is 6500rpm?

Anyways I'd be happy and your car seems very healthy.

[davefish]

Hehe John. I still don't think there would be anything in it rolling in gear. I loose 22-24% through AWD transmission I think. Rev limit is 6900 untill I get it mapped ;-)

[Saint Steve]

so if you minus out 22-24%, does that mean you have 240 actual wheel hp?

[Teutonic_Tamer]

so if you minus out 22-24%, does that mean you have 240 actual wheel hp?

No, the dyno calculates all that for you, and the figure, whilst measured at the roadwheels, is really meant to be a "corrected" flywheel horsepower.

[topher]

stick my name down for the RR day Dave.. seem to have lost the thread on r32oc

[gazbutmk5gti]

You usually get 2 figures, whp and a flywheel, although as TT says this is a calculated figure and different RR's use different methods for calculating it. This is 1 of the many reasons why there are big differences from RR to RR.

[davefish]

so if you minus out 22-24%, does that mean you have 240 actual wheel hp?

No, it will be pretty much bang on 200hp.

[Saint Steve]

jesus, thats a hell of a transmission loss if thats flywheel horsepower.

[Teutonic_Tamer]

jesus, thats a hell of a transmission loss if thats flywheel horsepower.

Not really - that is about the ball park percentage figure for four wheel drive motors. 

However, thinking a little more on this, how do they make allowances for the Haldex system, which can go from 2wd to 4wd - and therefore the calculations should really be on a variable scale!