Author Topic: Braking  (Read 1315 times)

Offline Mikester

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,427
  • Civic Type R
Braking
« on: 25 April 2008, 23:59 »
What is the balance of the braking, as in how much is done at the front to the rear.

I have new tyres discs and pads on the front, and worn rear tyres discs and pads.

How much is this affecting my braking? as the front setup is all good branded stuff, eaglef1 tyres, brembo discs and green stuff pads.

And the rear is worn to bits.

Also, how hard is it to increase the size of the rear brakes? As they look weedy and small. lol

Offline eightyeightmph

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,675
Re: Braking
« Reply #1 on: 26 April 2008, 00:09 »
70/30 front to back I think, least that's what it is on a Beetle?! :tongue:

Either way, more at the front than the back!
2016 GOLF GTD

Offline Mikester

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,427
  • Civic Type R
Re: Braking
« Reply #2 on: 26 April 2008, 00:10 »
And is it a big job to fit bigger rear brakes or what is the deal there? As they do look pretty pansy

Offline DazVR6

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,705
  • mk3 VR6...FEEL THE GRUNT.
Re: Braking
« Reply #3 on: 26 April 2008, 00:51 »
70/30 front to back I think, least that's what it is on a Beetle?! :tongue:

Either way, more at the front than the back!

Thaught it was 75/25 but near enough i guess.

Offline VW_08

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 281
Re: Braking
« Reply #4 on: 26 April 2008, 01:18 »
couldnt care what it looks like on the rear, mine stop me on a dime, mind you ive got the 16v with the bigger front brakes(VR6 items)   :cool:

Offline bow

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 66
Re: Braking
« Reply #5 on: 26 April 2008, 08:32 »
its around 70/30 you can change this by replacing the brake splitter but dont recomened it,its not that hard to upgrade rear brake setup but you dont need to just upgrade the pads discs and also the hoses

Offline boneybradley

  • Forum Supporter
  • Serious forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,482
  • Back in a Mk3...
Re: Braking
« Reply #6 on: 26 April 2008, 09:10 »
don't upgrade the rear's as they do so little braking...it's pointless really as the brakes wont be any keener.

and can i add..vr6 brakes. all gti models to 95 and the vr6 until 93 had 280mm front discs and then after 95 for the gti and after 93 for the vr6 had biger 288mm discs  :nerd:
Moderator of The Dub-Tug Squad!! (What some call the MK3 section!)



Full range of quality parts for your Volkswagen available at Oemandmore.co.uk

Offline Mikester

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,427
  • Civic Type R
Re: Braking
« Reply #7 on: 26 April 2008, 10:46 »
couldnt care what it looks like on the rear, mine stop me on a dime, mind you ive got the 16v with the bigger front brakes(VR6 items)   :cool:

lol, i also have 288mm brakes same as you, and the vr6.......

Offline Pete Taylor

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,229
Re: Braking
« Reply #8 on: 26 April 2008, 15:23 »
The brakes on the back are plenty good enough. They only need upgrading if you have a super tuned beast. Or like me you want to upgrade them just because they look too small behind 17s lol

Offline Rmachines

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,901
  • Passat 20vT Estate and Candy White MK3 1.8 GL
Re: Braking
« Reply #9 on: 26 April 2008, 21:27 »
you dont want to go messing with the brake balence.  If you upgrade the rear brakes and get it wrong you might well end up facing the oposite direction every time you hit the peddle.   :grin:  Always do a full upgrade.

The only thing you can get away with is using weeker rear brakes,  as long as its not to far out..  as then once again you will end up skiding alover the place
10 golfs and counting! 

Engine cranes = the ultimate tool to test the tensile strength of Everything you didn't disconnect!