Author Topic: 16v or 8v  (Read 91064 times)

golfvr6

  • Guest
Re:16v or 8v
« Reply #150 on: 22 April 2004, 00:37 »
Or maybe something to do with the fact that more valves means better engine BREATHING  :D
Where do you get those figures from Zoid?
The vw owners manual for 1991 stated that the 8v does 0-60 in 10 secs, and the 16v does 0-60 in 8.5.
There is no way that an 8v digifant does it in 8.3, if it did then the 16v would do it in 7  :)

marcus123

  • Guest
Re:16v or 8v
« Reply #151 on: 22 April 2004, 08:51 »
Tinman :P

i kno your not an idiot (well kind of) :o

read this well, just so you cant misunderstand me again.

for ME and every1 else that would like to tune there golf the 8valve is a better choice everytime. and it wasnt a car salesman that sold it to me, it was the independant expert advice from c and r. do you want there number as well? ;)

just to finish off

tinman you need to READ other peoples views before you make your comments.

because the point you made about the 996 was a joke
 :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
crap sarcasm.......we are talking about golfs here mate!

can we not all just get along?

how about a truce? :P

Offline tinman

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,229
Re:16v or 8v
« Reply #152 on: 22 April 2004, 19:27 »
good lord - is this still going on?

have we found something about an 8v that propels it in front of a 16v?

dont think so.

we do get along, dont worry. drop me a mail when your little white flag starts waving  8)

Tin

Offline Zoid

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 152
Re:16v or 8v
« Reply #153 on: 22 April 2004, 19:37 »
Or maybe something to do with the fact that more valves means better engine BREATHING  :D
Where do you get those figures from Zoid?
The vw owners manual for 1991 stated that the 8v does 0-60 in 10 secs, and the 16v does 0-60 in 8.5.
There is no way that an 8v digifant does it in 8.3, if it did then the 16v would do it in 7  :)

Those figures were scanned in from the VW 'Specification and equipment 1990 model year', i don't know where you got your figures from? Anyway the 8v digi will do 0-60 in 8.3 seconds, there is no way it's 1.5 seconds slower to 60!
« Last Edit: 22 April 2004, 19:42 by Zoid »

golfvr6

  • Guest
Re:16v or 8v
« Reply #154 on: 22 April 2004, 23:55 »
Er yes it is. The figures i got were from veedubgti8v's owners manual.
He has a 1991 J reg 8v gti.
There is no way that an 8v gets to 60 0-4 sec slower than a 16v, it is much more than that.
Marcus, the 8v is only cheaper and easier to tune NOT better, the 16v will ALWAYS give better results.
More valves = more power.
Tuned or not.
Its not hard  :) ;)

Offline roar

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 22
Re:16v or 8v
« Reply #155 on: 23 April 2004, 16:35 »
For what its worth, VW are well known for quoting performance figures for their cars well slower than the cars can actualy do. A tv show about a year back said their mk2 j reg pulled 60 in about 8 seconds. Driven by a pro.........

But of course, its still not as quick as a 16v.

marcus123

  • Guest
Re:16v or 8v
« Reply #156 on: 23 April 2004, 17:11 »
man i love my 8valve you kno ;)

my last car was a fiat coupe 20v turbo.

and i much happier with this!!!!

the vr6/g 60 engine is coming tho, just so i can get back into the realms of 0-60 in post 6 seconds!

golfvr6

  • Guest
Re:16v or 8v
« Reply #157 on: 23 April 2004, 17:44 »
There are some benefits with the 8v, it is deffo easy to work on compared with a 16v, and probably quite a bit cheaper.
Still the 16v will always be better tuned or not to equilavent 8v , depends how much cash you have to spend  :) ;)

Offline Zoid

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 152
Re:16v or 8v
« Reply #158 on: 23 April 2004, 18:38 »
It's in black and white.....


golfvr6

  • Guest
Re:16v or 8v
« Reply #159 on: 23 April 2004, 18:40 »
I'll get veedubgti8v to put his owners manual on the site.
That too is in black and white  :)