GTI or CL?????

[Veedubgt18v]

besides its not just the car driver skill(and balls!) plays a big part, a mk3 8v is a decent car, yes its reliable, build quality is quite good (especially on later ones) parts are readily available, and premiums arent bad, its just not a heart stopper thats all. but then neither is the mk2 8v, or 16v, or mk3 16v, there ae loads of cars out there qhich are quicker, especially modern ones, it just so happens that a mk2 8v is the best and fastest car i can afford (or want to own) at the moment, dont get me wrong as soon as i can affors a faster car i will get one, but until then im just gonna be happy with mine as is. and you should be to black cl, so anyway i think 99% of the site, even fellow mk3 owners are bored with you so give it a rest, thank you please  

[Jimbobsbig.69]

Here, Here.

[JMallows]

My car is 16 years old in a few days. Show me your car when its 16 years old, if its as good, then yeah, you can say its built better than the MK2. I dont think ANY modern car is as well built as an older car, thats the way the 80's were. The original 16 year old paint on my MK2 is better then the 2 year old paint than my MK4. But, the mark3 MAY well be better if it has more luxuries with it, i dont know, i've never driven one. Most people say the MK2 is the best and fastest, but why should that bother you? You have the car you want, we have the car we want. What more maters?