Author Topic: Standard Golf GTI Vs R32  (Read 16483 times)

Offline R32UK

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,693
Re: Standard Golf GTI Vs R32
« Reply #90 on: 22 April 2009, 16:49 »
in all honesty wer'e all wrong as the best looking/performing value for money collactable is without a doubt the ed30 sexual in all ways ie looks, performance, rare etc, i want 1 lol :angry:

An edition 30 is not quicker than an R32. This has been done  :wink:

Offline ifti

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,117
Re: Standard Golf GTI Vs R32
« Reply #91 on: 22 April 2009, 18:28 »
If it wasnt for that chrome front of the R32, that makes it look like a passat, i would have went with the R32.
Because that that front, I much prefer my ED30 TBH. I do like the back of the R32 though, but am more then happy with my ED30 ;)

Jkctr

  • Guest
Re: Standard Golf GTI Vs R32
« Reply #92 on: 22 April 2009, 18:41 »
lol you didnt buy an R32 because of the front. What a stupid reason  :rolleyes:

Offline ifti

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,117
Re: Standard Golf GTI Vs R32
« Reply #93 on: 22 April 2009, 19:02 »
lol you didnt buy an R32 because of the front. What a stupid reason  :rolleyes:


I was commenting on the looks only.
Obviously the increased tax and running costs played a part!

Jkctr

  • Guest
Re: Standard Golf GTI Vs R32
« Reply #94 on: 22 April 2009, 19:07 »
£200 more a year to tax (mine is actually £210 though) and i get 30mpg on the motorway and high 20's even living in london. Theres very little difference in running costs between the R32 and GTI, nothing like say, a GTI and M3 for example. Even service costs are the same bar the haldex oil change.

Offline matthewsimone

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 242
Re: Standard Golf GTI Vs R32
« Reply #95 on: 22 April 2009, 19:08 »
yes jules a turbo r32 would annilate a modded ed30 but would cost the earth and just wouldnt be worth doing especially when someone comes along in a 10k standard evo8 and anillates your turbo32 lol so just not worth modding the 32 it should be quicker from standard imo its the top model costs alot more has a engine 60% bigger cc and is barely quicker than the ed30 = joke and anyone who thinks any mk4 will be a future classic is crazy i want what your taking lol R32 or not all mk4s are awful cars, its a insult to even mention it in same sentence as the mk1 or mk5  :laugh: :laugh: peace lol

Offline Ed30DSG

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
  • Edition 30 - gone - Audi S3 here
Re: Standard Golf GTI Vs R32
« Reply #96 on: 22 April 2009, 19:13 »
£200 more a year to tax (mine is actually £210 though) and i get 30mpg on the motorway and high 20's even living in london. Theres very little difference in running costs between the R32 and GTI, nothing like say, a GTI and M3 for example. Even service costs are the same bar the haldex oil change.

Really, do VW offer buy 4 & get 2 free on spark plugs these days? LOL

Offline matthewsimone

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 242
Re: Standard Golf GTI Vs R32
« Reply #97 on: 22 April 2009, 19:14 »
lol ed30 dsg  :laugh:

Offline ub7rm

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,476
Re: Standard Golf GTI Vs R32
« Reply #98 on: 22 April 2009, 19:17 »
.......... R32 or not all mk4s are awful cars, its a insult to even mention it in same sentence as the mk1 or mk5  :laugh: :laugh: peace lol

Whoa whoa whoa, lets not go nuts.  Thats my first car you're slaging off  :cry: (a GTI not a R32).  The mk4 was admitidly a poor effort for a GTI but it had its charms, all it needed was a little bit of remapping and it was the car VW should have rolled out.  Lets not mention the 2.0's  :lipsrsealed:  
2020 BMW 128ti
2017 Golf GTD Estate

Offline R32UK

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,693
Re: Standard Golf GTI Vs R32
« Reply #99 on: 22 April 2009, 19:26 »
yes jules a turbo r32 would annilate a modded ed30 but would cost the earth and just wouldnt be worth doing especially when someone comes along in a 10k standard evo8 and anillates your turbo32 lol so just not worth modding the 32 it should be quicker from standard imo its the top model costs alot more has a engine 60% bigger cc and is barely quicker than the ed30 = joke and anyone who thinks any mk4 will be a future classic is crazy i want what your taking lol R32 or not all mk4s are awful cars, its a insult to even mention it in same sentence as the mk1 or mk5  :laugh: :laugh: peace lol

Thats the point!!! the R32 is not alot more than the ED30... infact when I went in to get mine the ED30 was costing alot more!

p.s. A evo 8 anillate a turbo'd R32??? are we talking about the 450bhp version or the 650bhp .:R32?? :grin: