Author Topic: Mild Vs Stainless  (Read 2777 times)

Offline Cupra Turbo

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,299
Mild Vs Stainless
« on: 28 February 2004, 17:58 »
Gimme the pro's and con's of these.

any sound, power etc difference?

does Mild Steel look crap after 3month???


... details, detail, details  ;D .................please  ;)

http://www.golfgtiforum.co.uk/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=38

Modified Golf GTI, 130Bhp(est), All Smoked Plus Quad Headl

Dinky

  • Guest
Re:Mild Vs Stainless
« Reply #1 on: 28 February 2004, 23:04 »
Dont know the exact pros n cons but hav always thought better of the s/less steel-plus u get the lifetime warranty guarantee-not if that means much  ???
Always thought they were worth that little bit more! :)

Dinky  :-*

turbo

  • Guest
Re:Mild Vs Stainless
« Reply #2 on: 01 March 2004, 14:42 »
mild steel take more of a battering its stronger where as stainless is more frigile but it doesnt rust......
the sound of either of them it how much wool they put in the baffles and also how its made.

Offline Cupra Turbo

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,299
Re:Mild Vs Stainless
« Reply #3 on: 02 March 2004, 15:20 »
Quote
Always thought they were worth that little bit more!

I am  :-*

http://www.golfgtiforum.co.uk/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=38

Modified Golf GTI, 130Bhp(est), All Smoked Plus Quad Headl

Offline hairyarse

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re:Mild Vs Stainless
« Reply #4 on: 02 March 2004, 15:42 »
I think I'm right in saying that S/steel is stronger than Mild. What you can find is that if you buy two comparable items, one in mild and one in stainless, the stainless one is weaker as a thinner gauge metal is used to keep costs down. :-\

Therefore, if you had a s/steel system with the same material thickness as the mild steel one it should be stronger.

Offline FastGTI

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 48
  • 1996 Golf GTI 16V
Re:Mild Vs Stainless
« Reply #5 on: 02 March 2004, 15:48 »
May be stating the obvious...but err, stainless steel doesn't stain (rust) so will look good for a lifetime as long as you take a bit of care.

Mild steel is a cheaper alternative.

Dinky

  • Guest
Re:Mild Vs Stainless
« Reply #6 on: 02 March 2004, 18:58 »
Quote
Always thought they were worth that little bit more!
 

I am  
;) ;D

Dinky  :-*

Offline davidhawkins_78

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 905
  • Valver Bad Boy
Re:Mild Vs Stainless
« Reply #7 on: 04 March 2004, 15:10 »
I'm sure there is a difference in engine performance to depending on the materials used .... remember it from my uni days (BSc Automotive Engineeering  ;D)

If you had the same system made from both materials one would give better torque and the other better top end - can't remember what's what though and it's marginally ....

I'd say go for Stainless as you get a lifetime warranty so if it breaks it gets fixed / replaced and it won't rust !

What's the point in spending ?200 on a system that'll only last a year or so !


'89 Monza Blue Valver
to quote a VW engineer, "the Mk1 was the prototype, the Mk2, the real thing!"

Offline Cupra Turbo

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,299
Re:Mild Vs Stainless
« Reply #8 on: 04 March 2004, 20:21 »
Exactly!

Magnex it is fo me then .... URRGGH another ?100 onto my already extorsionate premium!  :'( :'(

K&N next week tho  ;D

http://www.golfgtiforum.co.uk/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=38

Modified Golf GTI, 130Bhp(est), All Smoked Plus Quad Headl

Dinky

  • Guest
Re:Mild Vs Stainless
« Reply #9 on: 04 March 2004, 23:14 »
Quote
Magnex it is fo me then
Black_gti-gud choice! ;D Ive always thought they were a gud exhaust manufac as well! ;D Always stay clr of the peco! :o Unless ya wanna b a charver?! ;D

Dinky  :-*