I think that the S3 just doesn't look special enough to warrant the huge price tag.
But that is NOT the ethos of hot Audis. They are not "in your face, look at me" type of cars. They are "understated" for a reason.
If you must have a car which "looks special", then look elsewhere, because an Audi will never fit that particular requirement. Look at my RS4, and you will see what I mean.
http://www.golfgtiforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=56988.0Buying a GTI , S3 or similar you want a head turner... and for me the Ed30 wins that hands down.
But not everyone wants a "head turner"!
I've had 4 Audi's in recent years, mostly A3's of various descriptions, and they are quite understated in looks...
Sigh . . . that is the whole point!
From my experience the build quality is no better than the VW's I've had in that timeframe either.
Ohhh, I'll have to disagree. When you have the luxury of both, side by side - then the quality of the materials, especially the interiors - the Audis are way ahead of the VWs. There are many, many small areas of detail where the quality differs between VW and Audi.
Pound for pound too, the A3 is way more expensive than the similar VW... for near enough the same car.
Hmm, that is a subjective comment. OK, I think we all agree that you pay a "premium" for those four rings. And on the face of it, they may appear to be very similar. However, the devil is in the detail, in terms of quality of materials. Then there is the residuals at trade in time. With the exception of the GTI (which is a niche model, with "cult" like status), Audis have always enjoyed far stronger residuals compared to VW.
I've also come to the conclusion that I actually prefer FWD to 4WD.
Hmmm, what type of "4WD" cars? I'm sure you know not all so-called 4WDs are the same!
I've had a couple of 4WD cars in recent years, and none of them have lasted too long before I feel the urge to trade them and get a FWD again.
Well that last comment simply states you get far greater enjoyment out of wheelspin, rather than traction!
