Ok, without wanting to labour the point, I work for a Motorsport engineering Company, so IÂ’m more akin to oily bitÂ’s than lighting, so maybe some of my too many years in technical sales has come across in my thread
Hm... "Motorsport engineering Company", "technical sales", and "I work for": so you
are connected with the industry in some way! Perhaps this was a practice "dry run" for some marketing posts for your own company. If you update your signature with all your details, & show a little more transparency to all, then you might (or not!) have got some different replys to your OP.
But I can assure you I donÂ’t have any vested interest in any companies mentioned
Hm... but you
do work for a trading company, directly relating to the motor industry, and I've no doubt your company offers some kind of "services" (specific, maybe), to the general motoring public, and also to owners of VWs and members of this forum.
I am quick to complain about poor workmanship, and feel itÂ’s only just to give praise where praise is due, and found the two firms mentioned to be worthy of such
Very hollow, and utterly contradictory words. You had initially posted your "concerns" on the legality of retro-fit HIDs, and you even suggested a work-around, for the MoT test. You have subsequently been told that the fitment
and use of your retro fit HIDs are utterly illegal. You have also been told that the light produced by your headlamps are an MoT failure, and therefore illegal. Yet you still do
not condemn the place that fitted them, or the actual kit as supplied.
If it were me, innocently (unaware of the legal issues) asking for work to be carried out on my car, and subsequently finding out (a) the work IS substandard, (b) it has made my car illegal, (c) it WOULD invalidate my insurance, (d) it would lead me open to prosecution, (e) it could lead me open to financial ruin from any accident... and on, and on. At this stage, I would be spitting blood and feathers, demanding the work be removed and restored to OEM standard, demanding a full refund, plus compensation, etc, etc.
To me, and I'm perfectly sure to others, your definition of "poor workmanship" would obviously include the actual "nuts and bolts" physical workmanship, but also any written literature supplied and oral advice from the supplier and/or fitter. Whilst they may have snipped the loose ends of their ty-raps at a neat 90-degree angle, it is the whole picture, the whole issue of the total "service" which needs to be recognised and addressed.
To be continued . . .