« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: r32 vs mapped gti  (Read 1028 times)

Offline jonny_d

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 58
r32 vs mapped gti
« on: 14 December 2005, 20:56 »
Do u think it would be a fair contest 0-60, round a track? etc what would win. i'm looking at the r32 being heavier therefore being a bit more sluggish?!?
Logged

Offline Neaty

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,395
Re: r32 vs mapped gti
« Reply #1 on: 14 December 2005, 21:06 »
its got the advantages of 4 wheel drive traction tho
Logged

Offline jonny_d

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 58
Re: r32 vs mapped gti
« Reply #2 on: 14 December 2005, 22:40 »
*Gti being a 1.8t.(How dumb am i?)

Yeah thats what i thought just wondered ppls opinions on the r32 in comparison to a car which is about 10 grand+ cheaper.
Logged

Offline Neaty

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,395
Re: r32 vs mapped gti
« Reply #3 on: 14 December 2005, 22:43 »
I prefer the look of the GTI to be honest, and if i had one i probably would get it mapped to about 230bhp!
Logged

Offline jonny_d

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 58
Re: r32 vs mapped gti
« Reply #4 on: 14 December 2005, 22:54 »
yeah ive got a 1.8t. tbh i really dont like the r32 looks wise, (Looks like a rice car). prefer the smooth lines of the gti. the only thing that outways the the 1.8t to the r32 is the 4wd.
Logged

Offline Neaty

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,395
Re: r32 vs mapped gti
« Reply #5 on: 14 December 2005, 22:57 »
yea i really like the mark 4 R32 tho!
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »