Author Topic: Dynaudio Vs Plug and Play  (Read 9704 times)

Offline gtiaps

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 633
Re: Dynaudio Vs Plug and Play
« Reply #20 on: 01 February 2017, 07:15 »
That's also known as mib1 or mib2.  If it has car play app connect then it's mib2... From about mid 2016 onwards

I ordered mine 30th January 2016 and it came mb2 with car play etc..
2010 Candy White Scirocco 2.0 TDI
2016 Carbon Grey Gti 2.0 Fully Loaded

COLLECTED 29/4/2016 and well pleased with the GTI😆😆

Offline Sootchucker

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,348
Re: Dynaudio Vs Plug and Play
« Reply #21 on: 01 February 2017, 07:24 »
We collected my new GTD and the Wife's Polo Blue GT last May (2016) and both cars had apple car play, Android Auto and Mirrorlink installed (although we did have to pay around £100 on the Polo to get this feature activated during build time). Was standard and free on the Nav Pro.
2022 Tiguan R-Line 2.0 TSI 4-Motion. Nightshade blue, pano roof, IQ lights, Nav Pro, Harmon Kardon, Heated Windscreen, Heated rear seats, Wireless charging, Heads up display, dual height boot floor, Keyless with electric tailgate, Electronic TPMS, underbody protection, Area View Cameras

Offline fredgroves

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,929
  • Professional Um Bongo drinker
Re: Dynaudio Vs Plug and Play
« Reply #22 on: 01 February 2017, 09:02 »
When I say "mid 2016" I mean delivered about mid-2016, not ordered :)
Current: Mk8 GTI DSG, Adelaides, DCC, HUD, HK, Winter Pack, Rear Camera.. Aka "HMS Weasel"

Gone: 2017 Mk7.5 GTD,manual, NavPro
Gone: 2014 Mk7 GTD, manual, NavPro, DCC

Offline infernox

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: Dynaudio Vs Plug and Play
« Reply #23 on: 01 February 2017, 23:47 »
Oh I know about MIB1 and MIB2 but haven't seen it be called DM1 and DM2. I realised why you can call it DM1 and DM2 though. I'm looking at a 16 plate Golf R atm and it has MIB2. I thought that started in 2015.

Offline Hertsman

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 727
Re: Dynaudio Vs Plug and Play
« Reply #24 on: 03 February 2017, 15:35 »
Obviously subjective but ..

Had 2 x A3 S Line Quattro with standard set up, decided to treat myself to BOSE in 3rd and though there was a sense of uplift in quality the fact I was looking for it as some justification says more I think. The covers were pretty cool to point to though.

Next car was a GTD and avoided the upgrade having been burnt once and was more than happy with the sound, good bass, good treble and stereo differentiation.

Regular CD across these cars is Heaven 17 Penthouse and Pavement and a few certain tracks dart between the speaker and need good clarity to do the tunes justice and none of the set ups failed.

So now on a MK 7 R with standard set up and again its pretty decent.

Now I am no audiophile but do like my music so will qualify my ears a little more in that have 3 x Sonos Play 1 and 1 x Sonos Play 5 as my main listening. Also, though a little redundant now and more a feature is a decent Denon system coupled to Mission Speakers.

So basically i would not tolerate a shoddy sound but do feel the standard system is decent. Connectivity is now much better on the MIB 2 with Car Play and Bluetooth working really well,

Also you have to think where listening, as the car is not a decently set out front room for good audio quality.

Can only see you get the real benefit of in car audio if on a long cruise on your own.

My environment usually involves passengers, short to medium journeys and quite a a bit of radio or playlists from my Deezer and none really conducive to great audio which is reason most decent audio shops have quiet rooms to demonstrate their tech.

Cannot see the ££ uplift being matched by audio lift and more so in a compromised environment. If standard set up was naff, then yes 100%, but it is not.

But its subjective, many will say its worth every penny, and swear by it,

This is my view and am saying save your money for something that would make a difference or just save it

Best decider is to go to a showroom and sit in both and be totally honest about what hearing.
« Last Edit: 03 February 2017, 15:36 by Hertsman »
Present - BMW 128Ti Alpine White, 18" Performance Tyres, Sun Protection Glass, Parking Assist, Heated Steering, Boston Trim, Split Folding Rear Seats, Electric Lumbar Support
- 2nd car: 2019 Golf R DSG Pure White 19" Black Pretoria, Privacy Glass, Rear View Camera, Dynaudio, Keyless
- 2019 Pure Grey GTI TCR 5 Door DSG Reifinitz Wheel DCC Climate Screen 90% Tint
- 2016 Lapiz Blue Golf R 5 Door DSG Pretoria DCC
- 2013 Pure White GTD 5 Door DSG DCC

Offline Tuckerjuk

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 12
Re: Dynaudio Vs Plug and Play
« Reply #25 on: 04 February 2017, 19:02 »
Iv got Dynaudio and sound quality is much better and clear all way up sound range. Now iv had it id probably always pay the extra £500 odd.

Offline infernox

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 88
Re: Dynaudio Vs Plug and Play
« Reply #26 on: 04 February 2017, 23:09 »
Obviously subjective but ..

Had 2 x A3 S Line Quattro with standard set up, decided to treat myself to BOSE in 3rd and though there was a sense of uplift in quality the fact I was looking for it as some justification says more I think. The covers were pretty cool to point to though.

Next car was a GTD and avoided the upgrade having been burnt once and was more than happy with the sound, good bass, good treble and stereo differentiation.

So now on a MK 7 R with standard set up and again its pretty decent.


Off topic but how did you find the ride comfort on the GTD/GTI and R compared to your old S-line A3's? I got a A3 sport but its got the s-line 18 inch wheels so must be similar.

Offline madmark63

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 28
Re: Dynaudio Vs Plug and Play
« Reply #27 on: 05 February 2017, 18:30 »
i did spec mine with the dynaudio as i like the sound ,dont get me wrong the standard setup is very good but the dynaudio is even better  :wink:
gti mk7 5 door in black dsg /performance pack,tech pack,parking pack,19" satiago,s with dcc