Author Topic: 40 Years of GTI Performance.  (Read 6352 times)

Offline Tornado8

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 216
40 Years of GTI Performance.
« on: 30 August 2015, 17:41 »
With 40 years of GTI I thought I'd look at the progress of the GTI from MK1 TO MK7.
The figures I found were as follows:-

MK1 110BHP 0-60 9.0s 103lbft Torque 810kg 135BHP/Tonne

MK7(3 door) 220BHP 0-60 6.5s 258lbft Torque 1400Kg 157BHP/tonne

So over 40 years it seems the power to weight ratio( I thought it would be a lot higher) :shocked: is nothing compared to the increase in the torque figures which I find rather interesting. What do you think?
Old, but a serial modder!

Offline CraigW

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,305
Re: 40 Years of GTI Performance.
« Reply #1 on: 30 August 2015, 20:52 »
I think that you must have had a really boring day looking up those stats  :grin: :grin:

Offline Tornado8

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 216
Re: 40 Years of GTI Performance.
« Reply #2 on: 31 August 2015, 10:59 »
Absolutely, I even washed and polished and cleaned the car inside and out :grin:
But the other point I want to raise whilst I'm bored, is where will it all end a Mk14 GTI weighing 2000kg and 600HP :laugh:
Old, but a serial modder!

Offline Poached

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: 40 Years of GTI Performance.
« Reply #3 on: 01 September 2015, 10:24 »
I think it also needs to be viewed in the context of emissions and changing safety regs. But yeh they could be a bit more powerful which is why many have them remapped :laugh:.

As for the torque increase, that is an advantage of turbocharging without increasing cc. There probably wasn't much gain in torque between MK1 and MK3.
« Last Edit: 01 September 2015, 18:10 by Poached »

Offline Exonian

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 9,293
Re: 40 Years of GTI Performance.
« Reply #4 on: 01 September 2015, 13:47 »
As above, turbocharging is both the best and the worst things that happened with these cars.
You lose the instant response and character of the engine with turbocharging but when you want a bit more power out of the unit you can spend £500 - 700 on a remap and get an instant 40 - 50bhp plus lots more torque. When you think back to the mk1 you'd need at least £1000 (which would be double maybe now in real terms) just to modify the cylinder head and cam to give you extra power, which would be invariably mostly be at the top end, so then you'd need to add at least another £1500 to get the bottom end bored out to 1.9 or 2.0 so you then had decent torque to make it a much quicker on road performer. Been there and written the book.

So what we can see from the figures it that the power to weight is quite similar so the car retains a similar character of sorts; and when you consider the massive weight gain it shows how modern electronics mean that VW can still get similar fuel consumption figures out of the bigger engined heavier car.
With the mk1 it was the bodywork that rotted away making the car end up in scrap yards. The bodies tend to be much better built on the later cars (galvanised) but it's the electronic and engine failures that make it an unviable repair once it gets a few years old - you can't take a component out and replace or repair bits of it any more, instead the plethora of electronic units cost hundreds and hundreds at least to replace once they become defective meaning vehicles out of warranty are a ticking time bomb before something VERY expensive goes on them. That's why big old VW's, Audis and BMW's not to mention bigger French cars and Jap stuff depreciate so very heavily on their running and repair 'cost of ownership' liklihood. Along with affordable finance and throwaway society encouraged by the government(s) taxing older cars that aren't "green" enough despite the factories churning out probably chucking out god knows what into the atmosphere, never mind the raw materials production...

Therefore in real terms a new or newish GTI nowadays is probably far more affordable than when the mk1 was around for normal human beings, with a much higher spec to go with the extra weight.
Thankfully they come with a 3 year warranty now too unlike the 1 year with the mk1.
‘25 8.5R, ‘23 8R, ‘20 8CS, ‘19 135iX, ‘19 TCR, ‘17 Ed40, ‘17 GTD, ‘15 7R, ‘13 GTI PP, ‘11 GTI, ‘09 GTI, ‘98 Ibiza Cupra, ‘05 GTI, ‘06 Polo GTI, ‘04 GT TDI, ‘05 Fabia vRS, ‘02 GTI T, ‘03 Ibiza TDI 130, ‘01 Leon 180, ‘89 mk2 16v, ‘99 Ibiza TDI, ‘96 VR6, ‘98 Ibiza TDI, ‘92 VR6, ‘88 mk2 8v, ‘92 Polo G40, ‘91 mk2 8v, ‘89 mk2 8v, 205 GTI 1.9, ‘83 mk1 GTI, ‘80 Scirocco GTI, plus some others I’ve forgotten 

Offline Wo-Wo

  • Forum Supporter
  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 709
  • www.wo-wo.co.uk
Re: 40 Years of GTI Performance.
« Reply #5 on: 01 September 2015, 16:14 »
I'd take a MK1 Campaign all day long!

Offline Tornado8

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 216
Re: 40 Years of GTI Performance.
« Reply #6 on: 01 September 2015, 17:36 »
Well informed reply Exonian.
As each replacement model arrives it has to have more power, more mpg and be safer as well. There has to be a point where either the weight has to fall, or the engines become even more powerful or lighter or both :smiley:
Old, but a serial modder!

Offline Exonian

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 9,293
Re: 40 Years of GTI Performance.
« Reply #7 on: 01 September 2015, 19:18 »
Well informed reply Exonian.
As each replacement model arrives it has to have more power, more mpg and be safer as well. There has to be a point where either the weight has to fall, or the engines become even more powerful or lighter or both :smiley:
Err, thanks, just a bit of waffling from me really.
Excuse grammar etc too as I find it really hard reading back through tidying up paragraphs on my phone as it doesn't scroll very well at times.

I'd take a MK1 Campaign all day long!
I think most of us would like to think that.
I'll put it down to rose tinted specs.  :whistle:

Mine spent most of its life getting fixed.
It was rubbish up hill with any more than two people on board.
The brakes... we won't go there.
You needed arms like Arnie to steer it.

Still, it was fun  :smiley: but handling and safety have come a long long way since.
‘25 8.5R, ‘23 8R, ‘20 8CS, ‘19 135iX, ‘19 TCR, ‘17 Ed40, ‘17 GTD, ‘15 7R, ‘13 GTI PP, ‘11 GTI, ‘09 GTI, ‘98 Ibiza Cupra, ‘05 GTI, ‘06 Polo GTI, ‘04 GT TDI, ‘05 Fabia vRS, ‘02 GTI T, ‘03 Ibiza TDI 130, ‘01 Leon 180, ‘89 mk2 16v, ‘99 Ibiza TDI, ‘96 VR6, ‘98 Ibiza TDI, ‘92 VR6, ‘88 mk2 8v, ‘92 Polo G40, ‘91 mk2 8v, ‘89 mk2 8v, 205 GTI 1.9, ‘83 mk1 GTI, ‘80 Scirocco GTI, plus some others I’ve forgotten 

Offline Snoopy

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,761
  • Geoff.
Re: 40 Years of GTI Performance.
« Reply #8 on: 01 September 2015, 19:27 »
Quote from: Wo-Wo link=topic=275389.msg2518370#msg25linersdate=1441120441
I'd take a MK1 Campaign all day long!
:evil: :cool:

Quote
With the mk1 ibodywork that rotted away making the car end up in scrap yards. The bodies tend to be much better built on the later cars
Only early ones the late 82-83-84 cars had wheel arch liners,  waxoiled, underseal etc from the factory, to the same level as the mk2-s early cars.

Mk6 GTI  &  Mk1 GTI 
34 years of GTI ownership.

Offline Snoopy

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,761
  • Geoff.
Re: 40 Years of GTI Performance.
« Reply #9 on: 01 September 2015, 19:37 »
Well informed reply Exonian.
As each replacement model arrives it has to have more power, more mpg and be safer as well. There has to be a point where either the weight has to fall, or the engines become even more powerful or lighter or both :smiley:
Err, thanks, just a bit of waffling from me really.
Excuse grammar etc too as I find it really hard reading back through tidying up paragraphs on my phone as it doesn't scroll very well at times.

I'd take a MK1 Campaign all day long!
I think most of us would like to think that.
I'll put it down to rose tinted specs.  :whistle:

Mine spent most of its life getting fixed.
It was rubbish up hill with any more than two people on board.
The brakes... we won't go there.

You needed arms like Arnie to steer it.

Still, it was fun  :smiley: but handling and safety have come a long long way since.
you had a bad one then. Had mine 26 years and my daily for alot of that. Allways starts and had no problems with it in 26 years apart from age related  issues brakes,exhaust,suspension unlike these modern electronic, designed by accountants, vw piles of sh!t that keep disapointing me that we have had over that time too. Mine has no problems up hills pulled like mad with full load normally in 5th! so guess yours had big problems probably poorly adjusted injection system. Brakes are down to poorly setup rear adjustment, funny how poor brakes only come to light years lster and its actually due to ware and tear and never mensioned when new in any review. Keep on top of those silly wedge adjusters and weak springs on them and keep using genuine shoes and pads and the brakes are fine. Yes you have to push the pedal as its not massively servoed like modern audis but brakes as well as any other. Linkages sease and ware on the cross link pins too which can cause a play in the pedal.
Steerings heavy at parking speeds its not assisted so expected. Let the car crawl and it turns fine but still a little heavy. On the move its no worse than my leon. Im not a fan of the way it weights up in corners but the leon does the same. The performane is average nowadays and its not refined by modern standards and hasnt got the nvh of modern cars. Or the higher gearing for cruising on motorways but the throttle response especially and the way it freely revs because of the mechanical fuel injection compared to the strangled modern electronic controlled cars still shock me and makes me smile. As does the amount of space inside compared to its modest external footprint. The suspension is soft and it leansss by modern standards.
« Last Edit: 01 September 2015, 20:37 by Snoopy »
Mk6 GTI  &  Mk1 GTI 
34 years of GTI ownership.