Where would that affect you getting insurance. Would you be able to get insurance if you are not the registered owner for the first 3 months?
Would that not be the same as a lease car? I would imagine it would be the leasing company's name on the V5 could be wrong though. I certainly know when I had a car through my work scheme I never even seen a V5 never mind knew what name was on it. But I did by a car that had been previously leased as it had the lease company name on it.
I gave my wife my Audi A1 when I changed to the Golf. I certainly wasn't changing the V5 ownership and adding another owner so its still in my name. Loads of company's still insure if your name isn't on the document but an awful lot won't touch it.
So are you looking at it sitting at the dealers for 3 months before you can legally take ownership? That will be a killer!!
You don't have to be the legal owner though to drive on the road.
Surely its their administration that has fecked up. Its on their side that BSG can't have the car for 3 months. So could they not give it to him just now for an extended test drive for 3 months?
I think you could well be right. I thought the same about that being the case with leasing but as I've never leased a car, wasn't sure and didn't want to post inaccurate info up. I know you don't have to be the legal owner though. BSG is a laywer so if anyone can seek out the fine detail, it's him.
Not that he should have to though, as I agree, it's the dealer's error and they should be doing whatever is necessary to sort it out so BSG can drive the car away this Friday.
What form of revenge? Something very... petty no doubt!
Actually it's good news. I sent an e-mail last night setting out the position and (from a quick scan through the legislation) my understanding of the law.
Dealer called today to say - actually, on balance we'll register the car to ourselves, but then when the paperwork comes in we'll give it to you straight away so keeper can be transferred. No mention now of three months.
I don't want to appear uncharitable, or cast any doubt on their reasoning, but this wasn't an admin cock-up. I suspect that setting out the legal position and pointing out that doing it the way they suggested actually results in the commission of (at least two) criminal offences may well have swung it. Registered keeper and owner are obviously two separate issues - and the keeper doesn't have to be the owner, but failing to notify a change of keeper on sale or disposal is an offence.
Those four years studying law weren't a total waste. The subsequent years working in it however - I wouldn't like to say

But either way, delighted at the result - it's mine on Friday and I've promised not to dob them in

I imagine I'll not be getting a bunch of flowers though
