Author Topic: agg v pb head  (Read 2456 times)

Offline gazareth

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,349
agg v pb head
« on: 08 April 2015, 21:22 »
hey guys, does anyone know of a flow test ever being carried out on an agg head? everyone seems to be of the opinion that the pb head flows better but after examining both heads I just cant see how that could be :huh:

Offline Gti_Jamo

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,113
  • 1991 Corrado 1.8 G60
Re: agg v pb head
« Reply #1 on: 09 April 2015, 11:36 »
Both will be roughly the same in terms of flow. Any differences wiill be minimal.

I've just put a large port head from a G60 on an ebay auction that'll work on a PB bottom end if your interested.


97' Mk3 Golf Gti 2.0 8v Rebuild Project http://www.golfgtiforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=208865.0

Offline Waspy

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 705
Re: agg v pb head
« Reply #2 on: 09 April 2015, 11:45 »
Both will be roughly the same in terms of flow. Any differences wiill be minimal.

I've just put a large port head from a G60 on an ebay auction that'll work on a PB bottom end if your interested.

Linky Link.
It's a mk2. Fill it, drive it, enjoy it.  :smiley:

Offline Gti_Jamo

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,113
  • 1991 Corrado 1.8 G60


97' Mk3 Golf Gti 2.0 8v Rebuild Project http://www.golfgtiforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=208865.0

Offline gazareth

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,349
Re: agg v pb head
« Reply #4 on: 09 April 2015, 20:45 »
cheers jamo but I already have 2 spare digi heads. im noticing second hand ones are getting thin on the ground these days :shocked:. anyway about the agg v pb head. I was thinking if the agg has a cat and a milder camshaft yet still produces 3 bhp more than the pb engine at the same rpm wouldn't the head flow have to be better? I was reading about that khare fella putting a 285 cam in his agg and getting 138bhp. im pretty sure the same cam in a pb would not give such a massive increase? and rumour has it that fitting a pb cam into an agg gives a very noticeable boost to power. so all this leads me to think that the agg head/manifold is as good as if not better than pb. rant over :grin:

VW BUSH

  • Guest
Re: agg v pb head
« Reply #5 on: 09 April 2015, 21:48 »
Pb cam has slightly more duration than the agg cam from measuring the actual lift they are pretty close.
It definitely gave the agg/ady something but is not more than a few digits.
The pb cam needs to be ground down in one place to fit the agg heads extra bearing surface, I might still have one......
I fitted the same range cam as khare bear and ported and polished the whole intake and exhaust system, balanced the fly and fitted an fd of 3.9.
For an 8v tug it flew along if a little lumpy and thirsty.
in a mk2 it would be a lot of fun as the 2E swap was quite good.
But when you drive an abf mk2 the 8v seems pointless. ....

Offline gazareth

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,349
Re: agg v pb head
« Reply #6 on: 13 April 2015, 21:23 »
yeah an abf would be pretty decent in a mk2 :smiley: but as an everyday car I couldn't justify it. and with the amount of speed cameras going up everywhere these days. I would be bombarded with fpn`s :angry: