Author Topic: Renault Clio v6?  (Read 2681 times)

Offline seanule

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 70
Renault Clio v6?
« on: 25 January 2014, 20:09 »
Just how fast are these things? managed to have a ping with one the other day as I tried to pass, he did the standard foot to the floor you're not getting past technique  :grin:! going from about 40 to higher speeds I definetly pulled a good few car lengths on him  :evil: all on a track of course  :cool:

Question is are these beasts not as fast as on paper, 255 brake although maybe quite a weight to them?

My cars running revo stage 1 with a carbonio induction

Thoughts/opinions/discussions?

Ps I used to own a 182 and it was no match for even a standard mk6 gti!

Offline barrym381

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,934
Re: Renault Clio v6?
« Reply #1 on: 25 January 2014, 20:21 »

Offline andygo

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
Re: Renault Clio v6?
« Reply #2 on: 25 January 2014, 20:23 »
A lot of it will depend on who is driving it..

Clio182 weighs nothing - it has plastic wings, thinner glass etc. V6 clio isn't as light AFAIK, but sounds fab. A close friend of mine who has had a 182 and now a v6 reckons the 182 is faster round a track as its more nimble.

But whatever the car, if a stump is driving its never going to be faster than a slower car driven well.

Offline mkviken

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,786
Re: Renault Clio v6?
« Reply #3 on: 25 January 2014, 20:30 »
255bhp/300nm torque in 1400kg (175bhp/ton) would beat a GTI (156bhp per ton) i would guess. obviously if yours is stage 1 its probably 30 or 40 bhp more than standard.

if he's booted it from a constant speed while you were already accelerating past he's at a disadvantage straight away so not really an accurate comparison

Golf GTI Clubsport S #237 Tornado red
Golf GTI 7.5 230 white silver

Offline seanule

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 70
Re: Renault Clio v6?
« Reply #4 on: 25 January 2014, 22:09 »
255bhp/300nm torque in 1400kg (175bhp/ton) would beat a GTI (156bhp per ton) i would guess. obviously if yours is stage 1 its probably 30 or 40 bhp more than standard.

if he's booted it from a constant speed while you were already accelerating past he's at a disadvantage straight away so not really an accurate comparison



He accelerated as I tried to pass so we were tied on speeds around 40/50 maybe he let off but the things still sounded nuts! Just because of the look of these things I thought he would of blew me away haha  :grin: most likely he wasn't interested in any sort of race so not a fair comparison I suppose was just curious on people's thoughts of these beasts

Offline Jamesd1263

  • Just got here
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: Renault Clio v6?
« Reply #5 on: 27 January 2014, 22:40 »
They made a 225 version (227 really) 1355 kg
And a 255 (257) 1400kg

Offline bobbarley

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,615
  • I'm kind of a big deal...
Re: Renault Clio v6?
« Reply #6 on: 28 January 2014, 18:54 »
The other day on the motorway I overtook a DB9.  Is that the same thing?

Offline Carl!

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 159
Re: Renault Clio v6?
« Reply #7 on: 28 January 2014, 19:01 »
I can remember when these first came out and I was in the paddock at one of the race track whilst watching my brother race motorbikes; there were ferraris and alsort dotted about yet a clio v6 was getting easily the most attention, they do look mean!

Offline Thom89

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,096
  • Looking for an "Icebreaker"
Re: Renault Clio v6?
« Reply #8 on: 28 January 2014, 22:55 »
Clio V6's are actually quite crap, lardy, but boringly torquey, which is its downfall! It would take someone brave/stupid to drive one on public roads at a pace faster than a decent FWD car
Had they made it with a 2ltr 16v turbo with some grunt, then it would have bees a far better car imo

Thom

Offline tweed

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,379
Re: Renault Clio v6?
« Reply #9 on: 29 January 2014, 08:06 »
I guy near me had one about 5 years ago. I never spoke to him while he owned it but always admired it. He then sold it and got a red evo 8. I then asked why he sold it as it would surely be a classic?  He replied "its a rubbish car to be honest with you"
I guess for what it is and the hype they have, they must be a let down.
He said he bought the evo for the same money and its 1000x more fun.

I dont know if they are had to drive on the limit or a bit rear end happy but seams a lot better choices out there for the money.

But as I already said, these will be a classic and will only go up in money. It will be a investment.

Untitled by tweedub, on Flickr