I'm on club gti but got no response to my questions so thought I'd try another source.
It's because you aren't hardcore or clique enough.
I like the fact it's MFI and easy to tweak compared to EFI, don't like the fact the every time something goes on my car I'd need to plug it in or buy crank sensors ect, I like the original simplicity of it. I understand pro's and cons from each side but don't want to open a can of worms and change loads, I just want a fresh engine with more grunt, I'd be happy with 160bhp at the wheels, more is better tho
It's hardly going to be simple sorting the K-Jet so it runs properly and delivers that 160bhp on a consistent basis. Remember your MFI is governed by the 'map' provided by the shape of the bowl with the rising plate in it. Do you have a map for the shape of the bowl to suit a 200cc larger engine with a longer stroke?
By changing the capacity of the motor you're already opening a can of worms. Using a proper EFi solution that's designed for it closes the top of the worm-can more easily than just turning up the control pressure and hoping it doesn't run lean over 5k RPM
With regards to ABF in the syncro you have a more space anyway don't you being 4wd?
No, much less because we have 4WD. DannyP and I have made our own manifolds to suit.
Will the rear g60 mount fit my subframe then, looks way different to mine.
Should bolt right up IIRC
Do mk2 and mk3 subframes differ? I know the vr6 was wider track and supports more weight, but if the mk2 & mk3 16v subframes are the same that helps.
Yes they differ - the Golf3 uses a completely different rear engine mount. There are also additional bolt holes in tabs at the back, although you can cut these off.
The ABF on OEM management is the easy solution, which won't require visits to dynos to tune it in etc etc
The route you're going down will open the worm can and line the pockets of tuning specialists to get the same result.