Author Topic: RE MAP  (Read 1633 times)

Offline nickinspain2

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 22
RE MAP
« on: 24 November 2013, 18:00 »
HI, COULD SOMEONE TELL ME WHATS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A REMAP AND A SUPER CHIP, WHICH SHOULD I GO FOR? I HAVE A MK 4 2 LTR GTI, THANKS NICK.

Offline barrym381

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,933
Re: RE MAP
« Reply #1 on: 24 November 2013, 18:04 »
go for the remap but with being a non turbo the gains are minimal  :smiley:

Offline nickinspain2

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 22
Re: RE MAP
« Reply #2 on: 24 November 2013, 18:09 »
THANKS BARRY, IS IT A WASTE OF MONEY THEN?

Offline barrym381

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,933
Re: RE MAP
« Reply #3 on: 24 November 2013, 18:19 »
THANKS BARRY, IS IT A WASTE OF MONEY THEN?
not a waste of money but me personally i would sell the 2.0 an use the map money and what you get for the 2.0 and buy a 1.8t could even find 1 already mapped  :wink:

Offline james2

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,878
  • No scammers please.
Re: RE MAP
« Reply #4 on: 24 November 2013, 19:21 »
It will fell better. I super chipped my old ford xr2i and it made 118bhp on a dyno with the timing 3 degrees out ,i must of spent £1000s on upgrades. Ill never forget it loved that car. RIP  :whistle:
AGU 1.8T. Mods done: R32 front bumper, turborev smic, ngk platinum spark plugs, uprated pancake pipe, demon motorsport boost hoses, forge 007 dv, forge engine cover, r-tec stage 1 map ,home made cold airfilter ,run on 98 ron fuel and castrol edge 0w 40 oil. Advanti racing alloys.

Offline dom

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 10,084
  • Back in a Mk4
Re: RE MAP
« Reply #5 on: 24 November 2013, 19:26 »
HI, COULD SOMEONE TELL ME WHATS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A REMAP AND A SUPER CHIP, WHICH SHOULD I GO FOR? I HAVE A MK 4 2 LTR GTI, THANKS NICK.

Neither will give you massive gains, but a remap would be the best option. You won't see any real gain in peak power but you should feel better throttle response.

In my opinion it's really not worth the cost, the 2.0 is a pretty poor engine and I wouldn't want to waste any money on it.

Offline Wayne

  • Sir Postalot
  • *
  • Posts: 32,051
Re: RE MAP
« Reply #6 on: 24 November 2013, 20:48 »
Never worth the bother on a 2.0, save your money

Offline james2

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,878
  • No scammers please.
Re: RE MAP
« Reply #7 on: 25 November 2013, 16:46 »
VW Golf 2.0 8v   before   -  115 hp  after   - 122 hp  before   - 170 nm  after  - 180 nm
AGU 1.8T. Mods done: R32 front bumper, turborev smic, ngk platinum spark plugs, uprated pancake pipe, demon motorsport boost hoses, forge 007 dv, forge engine cover, r-tec stage 1 map ,home made cold airfilter ,run on 98 ron fuel and castrol edge 0w 40 oil. Advanti racing alloys.

Offline nickinspain2

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 22
Re: RE MAP
« Reply #8 on: 25 November 2013, 23:43 »
thanks chaps, ill be keeping me £200 quid then for larger!!!!!!!

Offline mar_k

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 806
Re: RE MAP
« Reply #9 on: 26 November 2013, 09:38 »
the 2.0 will never be exciting, Sell it and buy a 1.8 or 1.8t both in standard form will be far quicker than the 2.0

I loved my 2.0 as it was very smooth, but boring as hell.

A remapped 1.8t is very exciting for while and will keep you entertained until the need for more starts kicking in.