A bit of a twist on the mpg banter with the DTUK box addition. I filled the car up this morning so I can see how the box really affects mpg:-
168.7 miles covered, 18.78L used = 41.1mpg, 44.3mpg indicated. Overall 168.7 miles, MFD is 7.8% optimistic.
Prior to box fitment, car was reading 41mpg indicated at 105 miles. Probable 40mpg actual (assuming MFD is 2.5% optimistic, as is usually the case) = 2.625 gallons/12.02L used.
6.76L (1.48 gallons) used to travel 63 miles since the box was put on = 42.6mpg actual.
A 3.3mpg indicated improvement (44.3 vs 41) since fill up on 63.8 miles since box addition = extra 8.7mpg weighted for the 63.7 miles only.
42.6mpg actual + 8.7mpg (indicated improvement) = 51.3mpg probable indicated had the car been full from the box addition. Car is 20% optimistic on the MFD display vs actual.
That's fine, as long as I look at the MFD and know that if the computer is reading 52.8mpg, I got 44mpg. The box isn't for me to get improved economy. The extra torque might help economy (a little) for motorway cruising, but around the doors I don't think it will.
The above calculations are all a load of extrapolation on mixed circumstances.
I filled the car up this morning so I can get a proper MFD vs actual when I use a tank full of fuel.
Early indications prior to adding the box and after are that Jet fuel is sh!te for mpg. I will be sticking to Esso and BP in future.