TV recommendation again 55"

[clipperjay]

I thought 4K was only good on anything over 100" kinda like mega pixiel cameras makes no difference in small TV but only good at higher resolutions? 

[bobotheclown]

forget 103inches. Go for the 201inch TV!

http://www.bitterwallet.com/porsche-make-ludicrously-large-television-set/61883

[golf-sib]

4k and 8k would be more, regardless of how big the screen is, look at the quality of an apple 15" retina display that is supposedly res wise between 1080 and 4k, yet the quality simply due to the resolution is a huge difference when you just compare it to just 1920x1080, even on something like a 15" display. I'd be looking at 4k TV's but then again the question you have to ask, does anything support it yet?

[Jimble]

I've seen this TV on display in Currys and it's unbelievable how crisp the image is on such a big screen!   And i don't just mean from 20 foot away!


[font=.HelveticaNeueUI]http://www.currys.co.uk/gbuk/lg-84lm960v-ultra-hd-84-led-3d-tv-19393541-pdt.html[/font]

[clipperjay]

4k and 8k would be more, regardless of how big the screen is, look at the quality of an apple 15" retina display that is supposedly res wise between 1080 and 4k, yet the quality simply due to the resolution is a huge difference when you just compare it to just 1920x1080, even on something like a 15" display. I'd be looking at 4k TV's but then again the question you have to ask, does anything support it yet?

Wouldn't doubt the picture is good, but it just reminds me of the old battles of marketing hdmi vs DVi or betamax or VHS? Betamax was better quality but never had distribution or was plain too expensive?

[smoggy]

A bit out of my price range that 

Been looking at this

 http://www.sony.co.uk/product/tv-139-55-lcd/kdl-55hx853

Any thoughts ?