Author Topic: 2.016v or VR6 need opinions...  (Read 20708 times)

Offline tshirt2k

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,323
  • Been there...Done that...
Re: 2.016v or VR6 need opinions...
« Reply #50 on: 16 November 2012, 15:31 »
ABF cams in an ABF head is far better than KR cams in an ABF head.

You can get ~170-175 on a good standard engine with standalone management.


Mk3 ABF 16VT Megasquirt V3

Tshirt knows........ How to diagnose

Offline Len

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 16,298
  • Guardian of the Seas, Protector of Waves
Re: 2.016v or VR6 need opinions...
« Reply #51 on: 16 November 2012, 15:39 »
Who makes this standalone management? Where can one obtain one?
Mystic Blue Mk3 16v + Black Mk5 Gti 05 plate + Peugeot 405 Mi16

www.sas.org.uk
www.the-ace.org.uk

Offline Metallix

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 108
Re: 2.016v or VR6 need opinions...
« Reply #52 on: 16 November 2012, 15:41 »
Pretty much anything not original equipment.

Emerald, DTA, Megasquirt, AEM, Omex  etc.

Offline hobnobbob

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 109
Re: 2.016v or VR6 need opinions...
« Reply #53 on: 16 November 2012, 16:32 »
Myself an Khare both had our cars on the JKM rollers, his a 16v and mine a VR6. For the extra weight and fuel costs the gains don't seem worth it, only sound. Here are our graphs:

Mine:



His:

I would go for a 16v if i were to get another Mk3

That seems like a great figure. what have you done with yours then? just all the standard stuff thats been said?

i've been looking around at a few 16V's in my area and none have tickled my pickle yet so holding out.

Offline VR6_Wherry

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,940
Re: 2.016v or VR6 need opinions...
« Reply #54 on: 16 November 2012, 16:58 »
20mk3/IMG_20120211_154049.jpg[/img]
That seems like a great figure. what have you done with yours then? just all the standard stuff thats been said?

i've been looking around at a few 16V's in my area and none have tickled my pickle yet so holding out.

Just a BMC CDA Induction kit, Jetex decat pipe and a scorpion cat back system. Only other thing was a good service :smiley: the noise is something special :evil:

Offline hobnobbob

  • GTI forum regular
  • ***
  • Posts: 109
Re: 2.016v or VR6 need opinions...
« Reply #55 on: 16 November 2012, 17:05 »
20mk3/IMG_20120211_154049.jpg[/img]
That seems like a great figure. what have you done with yours then? just all the standard stuff thats been said?

i've been looking around at a few 16V's in my area and none have tickled my pickle yet so holding out.

Just a BMC CDA Induction kit, Jetex decat pipe and a scorpion cat back system. Only other thing was a good service :smiley: the noise is something special :evil:

That's handy as I've got that same induction kit from my old fiesta project!
At least I know the kind of figure I'll get. Thanks dude :D

Offline tshirt2k

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,323
  • Been there...Done that...
Re: 2.016v or VR6 need opinions...
« Reply #56 on: 16 November 2012, 21:54 »
Those figures aren't guaranteed.


Mk3 ABF 16VT Megasquirt V3

Tshirt knows........ How to diagnose

Offline benvictors

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,172
  • bgk Tuning - coming soon!!!
Re: 2.016v or VR6 need opinions...
« Reply #57 on: 16 November 2012, 22:33 »
My VR pulled 184bhp on the Docs DD rolling road with just a de-cat and im pretty sure them rollers are as god as any when it comes to accuracy. I now have the 2.9 obd1 plenum with port matched and polished tb so I reckon I wont be far off 200bhp now.
With not a great deal of work, you can get passed the 200bhp mark with a VR (Cams), however it will never handle aswell as a Valver, thats a certainty

Offline Ess_Three

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,123
Re: 2.016v or VR6 need opinions...
« Reply #58 on: 16 November 2012, 23:24 »
My VR pulled 184bhp on the Docs DD rolling road with just a de-cat and im pretty sure them rollers are as god as any when it comes to accuracy. I now have the 2.9 obd1 plenum with port matched and polished tb so I reckon I wont be far off 200bhp now.
With not a great deal of work, you can get passed the 200bhp mark with a VR (Cams), however it will never handle aswell as a Valver, thats a certainty

From experience: A 2.9 with a modified airbox, fully re-worked TB and a few other basic bolt one won't break 200 BHP...so I very much doubt a 2.8 will.
The upper manifold & TB are a great mod though.  :grin:

The US 12v head gasket (with a re-map) is a decent mod.

Reducing my Golf count by the week....
..but gaining motorcycles.

Offline WOLF R

  • Not said much yet
  • **
  • Posts: 18
Re: 2.016v or VR6 need opinions...
« Reply #59 on: 17 November 2012, 09:32 »
Some rather interesting, myths and opinions on here... :grin:

You guys should listen to Ess_Three and Tshirt2k.

But then what do I know these 2 powertrains... :whistle: