Kate middleton gets her baps out.

[Mrs kempie]

Has anyone else seen the THOUSANDS of pages on facebook about 'supporting kate's privacy'?

Is it bad I had this to say:

'Like if you support Kate Middleton's privacy'? Really, if it was any other celeb, people would be saying all sorts, but once a royal gets caught out being naked, it's like 'OHMYGOSHTHEKINGDOM!'

She should've known that if she was going away with Prince 'I Need Half A Bottle Of Sun Lotion To Cover My Bald Patch' William, she was going to get some attention from someone, and lets face it, if the journalists didn't snap the shots, someone else would've and sold them to said journalists.

I still fail to see what all the fuss is about anyway, I've seen bigger speed bumps on the street. Pippa Middleton's arse however, that I'd pay to see!

When some obviously pompous & very 'YAY THE ROYALS' commented stating that I was one of those sick, mindless people that scoured the internet for the pictures or bought the paper. I then turned around & replied with 'Well, duh.. Besides, I pay for her fancy pants clothes, I want some damn tits to say thank you!'

I think she is a little unsure as to what to say to a woman who would rather look at the royal's getting caught out than respecting their privacy...

 

[Mitching]

Journalists are thingys and so are the uneducated cretins that read tabloids for gossip.

[VW BUSH]

I think its all rather sad, agree with Mitch

[Thom89]

I think that over the last few years the Royals have changed a massive amount to bring themselves up to date, and the country is a better place for it... If the Royal family want privacy, then they should be entitled to it, just like anyone else, also, the royal family are not "Celebrities"
A big up to the British Press for not taking on the photos, wise move...
And no, not the slightest bit interested in seeing the pics, and no, I'm not gay

Thom

[scarr89]

Her baps aren't as great as I had hoped. 

[tg1]

it wasn't respect of the royals, we dont have the same rules for media here as elsewhere.

you all know if it was harrys bird, you'd of seen her in nuts/zoo already

[AudiA8Quattro]

I'm not gay

Are you sure? 

[Ant1981]

Should be a treasonable offence. I shall duly let Will's know my views the next time I see him.

[MrBounce]

Thing is, if this was a normal person in a private resort, what the photographer has done is effectively been a Peeping Tom and then sold the photographs for profit. If your wife/girlfriend had this done to them and the same thing happened (i.e splashed all over the internet/glossy sh!tbox mags) chances are you'd be livid unless she's an exhibitionist.

My legal thoughts would be to go after the photographer, not the mags.

[Thom89]

My legal thoughts would be to go after the photographer, not the mags.

My thoughts exactly

Thom