Author Topic: Anybody owned a Boxster 3.2 S 987?  (Read 7311 times)

Offline Ess_Three

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,123
Re: Anybody owned a Boxster 3.2 S 987?
« Reply #10 on: 11 September 2012, 15:50 »
Its not too sluggish but when you consider you can buy a mkv gti and mod it for under ten grand and produce a faster car, then it becomes a no brainer.

Remap, fmic, tbe, induction system, hpfp and a few traction mods and you can achieve 160mph+ 0-60mph in well under 5 seconds and far better mid range power delivery. The Boxster block only produces 220lbft, whereas the Gti is capable of 260-300lbft, or more if you tighten the waste gate rods on the turbo.

My Gti is almost exactly the above, less a hpfp and will clock a 40-140mph time in just over 23 seconds, some 8 seconds quicker than the Boxster 3.2s. And go from 0-100mph in under 11 seconds, 3 whole seconds quicker than the 3.2s.

Here's some links to prove it...

http://www.car-videos.net/performance/speed.asp?Speed1=40&Speed2=140
http://www.car-videos.net/performance/speed.asp?Speed1=0&Speed2=100




And the best thing about it all, the Gti's running cost will be far less than the Porsche, regardless of mods.  :smiley:

Hahahahahahaha....
And the GTI will still be a FWD shopping car with a reasonable chassis...not a proper sportscar.

The Boxster is brilliant.
Utterly brilliant...and a proper Porsche.
Those that slag it either can't drive, can't afford one, or have never driven one.
Do it.

If you are worried, just get an aftermarket warranty on it - or if you can justify it, a Porsche warranty.

Speed isn't everything...if you value the drive more than willy waving figures you will adore the Boxster.
It will swap ends if you get it wrong...but get it right, and it will make you smile like no VW ever will.

On a side note...
I came upon one in my heavily modified S3, on a wet day...and got utterly humped by it.
I barely saw which way he went.

In 5 years on my 996 (same basic engine) I had RMS leaks that were covered by warranty, but that I wouldn't have paid to have fixed if I didn't have a warranty...and no head gasket issues or any other problems.
It also cost less than my S3 to service.
It wore out no bushes, despite hooning round Europe and doing 18 laps of the 'ring.
It barely used any tyres (2 rears on 4 years, next to 3 full sets on the S3 in the same time/mileage)

Do it.

Reducing my Golf count by the week....
..but gaining motorcycles.

Offline Ess_Three

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,123
Re: Anybody owned a Boxster 3.2 S 987?
« Reply #11 on: 11 September 2012, 15:53 »
Thanks DH. I had read about the oil leaks so it's something to look out for. I am now on a boxster forum.

I shall give you some advice on how to avoid oil leaks - use it every day.
And use it hard. Get it hot...and let it work it's magic.
Mine leaked because it sat for weeks whilst I was offshore...cars used every day remain oil tight...with many miles on  :grin:

Quote
I can see that a modified golf would produce more power but it's not all about that for me. I have had a gold gti and civic type r so I'm done with hit hatches for now anyway.

Amen.
A decent Porsche is an itch that you really should scratch.


Quote
I will post back with a build thread and repair thread when it all goes wrong!

I'll not hold my breath.  :laugh:

Reducing my Golf count by the week....
..but gaining motorcycles.

Offline Ess_Three

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,123
Re: Anybody owned a Boxster 3.2 S 987?
« Reply #12 on: 11 September 2012, 15:56 »
Far more aristocratic choice than some front wheel drive hatchback and the handling will be proper.  Do it.

^
What he says.

You know you want to.  :evil:

Learn to drive it properly, learn to use the traction out of corners, wind a fantastic winding road and learn to brake until the ABS just gives the number of pulses you want (I liked 3!) and see if you can see the Golf GTI that was at one point up behind you.

Reducing my Golf count by the week....
..but gaining motorcycles.

Offline barrym381

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,932
Re: Anybody owned a Boxster 3.2 S 987?
« Reply #13 on: 11 September 2012, 15:59 »
Far more aristocratic choice than some front wheel drive hatchback and the handling will be proper.  Do it.

^
What he says.

You know you want to.  :evil:

Learn to drive it properly, learn to use the traction out of corners, wind a fantastic winding road and learn to brake until the ABS just gives the number of pulses you want (I liked 3!) and see if you can see the Golf GTI that was at one point up behind you.
i think it will be bye bye gti or r32  :wink:

Offline R32UK

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,683
Re: Anybody owned a Boxster 3.2 S 987?
« Reply #14 on: 11 September 2012, 16:03 »
If that were my money.. then I would also take a look at these. Hate to say it but much cooler than a Boxster  :lipsrsealed:

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/4168410.htm

And the last run out of one of the best engines ever produced. Get it right in this and the Boxster wouldnt see which way you went  :wink:

Offline Ess_Three

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,123
Re: Anybody owned a Boxster 3.2 S 987?
« Reply #15 on: 11 September 2012, 16:04 »
i think it will be bye bye gti or r32  :wink:

Well, a standard 3.2 left my 280BHP/330lb-ft S3, with Bilstein suspension and Brembo 4 pot brakes.
I mean just drove away...
In the wet, on a road covered in leaves...I couldn't believe it...I couldn't do anything with it.

So I suspect the majority of GTIs/R32s wouldn't have fared much better.

And all that, from an underpowered poor mans Porsche that's better suited to the hairdresser run?
Aye...right enough.

The 2.7 was a bit limp...the 3.2S is a completely different proposition.

Reducing my Golf count by the week....
..but gaining motorcycles.

Offline Ess_Three

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,123
Re: Anybody owned a Boxster 3.2 S 987?
« Reply #16 on: 11 September 2012, 16:06 »
If that were my money.. then I would also take a look at these. Hate to say it but much cooler than a Boxster  :lipsrsealed:

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/4168410.htm

And the last run out of one of the best engines ever produced. Get it right in this and the Boxster wouldnt see which way you went  :wink:

I would also suggest a 350Z as a proper old school RWD sportscar...you get a lot of Z for the set budget.

I'd still pick the Boxster though  :evil:

Reducing my Golf count by the week....
..but gaining motorcycles.

Offline leigh_harty

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,462
  • Audi AGU
Re: Anybody owned a Boxster 3.2 S 987?
« Reply #17 on: 11 September 2012, 17:17 »
350Z's do make a lovely sound aswell  :cool:
Dont lose your dinosaur!

Offline Mikester

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,427
  • Civic Type R
Re: Anybody owned a Boxster 3.2 S 987?
« Reply #18 on: 11 September 2012, 17:38 »
I have looked at Z4M and 350Z but they just don't do it for me.

It is looking like I might own one tomo. The cash is waiting and the one I'm viewing tomo looks like it could be a winner!

Offline MS1COYS

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 820
  • Alfie 'H' 10-09-11
Re: Anybody owned a Boxster 3.2 S 987?
« Reply #19 on: 11 September 2012, 18:07 »
The Op talked about figures, I replied with figures. Love the elitist/purist attitude.

I'd still rather have an m3 or a s2000...... :laugh:
Evolution Map / Longlife USA 80mm TBE w/100 cell Sports Cat / ITG Maxogen G60 / Forge Twintercooler/ Forge TB Hose / R8 Coilpacks / EBC D&G Front & Rear Discs / EBC Yellowstuff Pads / BSH PCV Kit / Poly Pro Front & Rear / W.A.L.K / APR Torque Arm / 034Motorsport Density Line Engine Mounts / Vibratechnics Subframe Mount / Vibratechnics Dogbone Bush

292bhp / 287lbft