I love these time lapse photos

[MAW73]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2165358/Australias-big-sky-photographers-patience-lead-stunning-time-lapse-images.html

 

[Diamond Hell]

Not timelapse - they're long exposure.

This is timelapse:

http://youtu.be/3fVDML76qrs

Please tell the Daily Mail they are idiots.

[mk3.owner]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2165358/Australias-big-sky-photographers-patience-lead-stunning-time-lapse-images.html

 

Amazing photography

[shepgti]

More an amazing location than the photography.

[DubFan]

From the description, it does sound like it's actually time lapse:
IE, the camera has taken a photo every 10secs then, rather than put them into a video, he's layered them up to create one image with swirls of stars.

[Ridg]

From the discription, it does sound like it's actually time lapse:
IE, the camera has taken a photo every 10secs then, rather than put them into a video, he's layered them up to create one image with swirls of stars.

It's called image stacking

http://digital-photography-school.com/4-steps-to-creating-star-trails-photos-using-stacking-software

Time lapse a video technique where the captured frames (by camera or video camera) are captured at a rate lower than the playback rate, this causes a lapse in time between each frame.

[DubFan]

From the discription, it does sound like it's actually time lapse:
IE, the camera has taken a photo every 10secs then, rather than put them into a video, he's layered them up to create one image with swirls of stars.

It's called image stacking

http://digital-photography-school.com/4-steps-to-creating-star-trails-photos-using-stacking-software

Time lapse a video technique where the captured frames (by camera or video camera) are captured at a rate lower than the playback rate, this causes a lapse in time between each frame.

So both the Daily Mail and DH are wrong.
Although I can see why the Daily Mail might call it Time Lapse, because it's more likely that a Daily Mail reader could understand it.

[Ridg]

From the discription, it does sound like it's actually time lapse:
IE, the camera has taken a photo every 10secs then, rather than put them into a video, he's layered them up to create one image with swirls of stars.

It's called image stacking

http://digital-photography-school.com/4-steps-to-creating-star-trails-photos-using-stacking-software

Time lapse a video technique where the captured frames (by camera or video camera) are captured at a rate lower than the playback rate, this causes a lapse in time between each frame.

So both the Daily Mail and DH are wrong.
Although I can see why the Daily Mail might call it Time Lapse, because it's more likely that a Daily Mail reader could understand it.

No, only the mail, the technique is image stacking, the photos are long exposure and now you're really arguing semantics.

Either way, some very nice images.

[dTEA]

Either way leave a camera that long in the same situ in most english towns and the camera will be nicked!!

[mcgee9t2]

Either way leave a camera that long in the same situ in most english towns and the camera will be nicked!!

awsome pics though