Author Topic: OLED  (Read 4660 times)

Offline Guy

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,118
Re: OLED
« Reply #10 on: 24 June 2012, 19:07 »
does OLED still suffer from short lifespan issues?

Offline damien010685

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,513
Re: OLED
« Reply #11 on: 24 June 2012, 19:58 »
I believe not mate from what I have read but time will tell when they become more available to the public

Offline R32UK

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,683
Re: OLED
« Reply #12 on: 24 June 2012, 21:36 »
does OLED still suffer from short lifespan issues?

i read that the blue ones have a span of just 10,000 hours (iirc) but they are improving this

Offline Steve30

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,519
  • Ed30 .
Re: OLED
« Reply #13 on: 24 June 2012, 21:43 »
Theres nothing on TV to justify the price  :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: 

Tiguan quicker than the Golf

Offline Steve_PD

  • Serious forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 7,121
  • Cruising around in a Land Cruiser
Re: OLED
« Reply #14 on: 24 June 2012, 21:45 »
What if it had a Apple logo on the front? Then it would be the dogs bollocks :lipsrsealed: :grin:
I often wonder why people never expect sarcastic comments from me - they're the only reason I speak...

Offline R32UK

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,683
Re: OLED
« Reply #15 on: 24 June 2012, 23:18 »
What if it had a Apple logo on the front? Then it would be the dogs nuts :lipsrsealed: :grin:

Very true... lets just wait for the I-OLED* to come out so the usual suspects can cream over it.


*most likely purchased from someone and rebadged  :grin: :lipsrsealed:

Offline Ess_Three

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,123
Re: OLED
« Reply #16 on: 24 June 2012, 23:25 »

The sony is beautifull to look at i have to say my pal has it.... But sorry to say the samsung on full Hd looks far more sharper But the sony is still nice... 
If i was you i wouldnt be holding of for OLED mate as it will still be a while before a 55 inch OLED is even 2.5k bud

I still prefer the Panasonic Plasmas...I keep looking at the competition & LCD but return to Panasonic and Plasma.
Maybe OLED will prove a step on.

Reducing my Golf count by the week....
..but gaining motorcycles.

Offline Guy

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,118
Re: OLED
« Reply #17 on: 24 June 2012, 23:27 »
does OLED still suffer from short lifespan issues?

i read that the blue ones have a span of just 10,000 hours (iirc) but they are improving this

thats what I thought... which equates to about 5 years at 8 hours a day (iirc)

Offline R32UK

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,683
Re: OLED
« Reply #18 on: 25 June 2012, 00:17 »
does OLED still suffer from short lifespan issues?

i read that the blue ones have a span of just 10,000 hours (iirc) but they are improving this

thats what I thought... which equates to about 5 years at 8 hours a day (iirc)

Thankfully my tv gets no where near that much use.. i prefer to use it for films/sports/ps3


Offline R32UK

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,683
Re: OLED
« Reply #19 on: 25 June 2012, 00:22 »


The sony is beautifull to look at i have to say my pal has it.... But sorry to say the samsung on full Hd looks far more sharper But the sony is still nice... 
If i was you i wouldnt be holding of for OLED mate as it will still be a while before a 55 inch OLED is even 2.5k bud

I have seen both and dont think the samsung picture is any better than the sony... in fact I would say the sony just pips it and most importantly does what a tv needs to do and focuses on the picture rather than bits you dont need.

2 remotes are a pain in the a$$ no matter which way you look at it. Just to add the samsung glases are far too flimsy for my liking and fail to block out any light from the sides (not that I care much for 3d).

As for OLED.. I had planned on buying a new tv in the next few weeks but for now I have brought my 40" LED 3D tv downstairs and that will do the job for the next couple of months