Author Topic: Top Gear  (Read 17145 times)

Offline mcgee9t2

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,289
Re: Top Gear
« Reply #100 on: 16 February 2012, 12:57 »
just read in the paper this weeks show they are driving up a mountain in some modified scooters.

could be funny :D

Offline GTI:Gibbo

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,462
  • More a way of life than just another car
Re: Top Gear
« Reply #101 on: 16 February 2012, 13:05 »
Sounds interesting.... Not  :lipsrsealed:

 :grin:

Offline mcgee9t2

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,289
Re: Top Gear
« Reply #102 on: 16 February 2012, 13:08 »
have a feeling it said mobility scooters actually, but already thrown the paper in the bin so is now covered in all sorts of rubish so i dont fancy going to check, we will just have to wait :D

Offline Jay

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,416
  • balding fat cvnt
Re: Top Gear
« Reply #103 on: 16 February 2012, 13:17 »
watched the second episode and it was funny, going to watch the 3rd this evening to see what all this fuss is about.
Passat B5.5 2.3 V5 170, with all the extras.

Want some online storage? Click here to sign up for a Dropbox account.

But for the purest engine experience, displacement has no replacement. All other methods are simply attempts to artificially recreate the benefits of displacement.

Offline DubFan

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,437
Re: Top Gear
« Reply #104 on: 16 February 2012, 14:31 »
I doubt they would axe it, because A) it's too popular, B) it's worth a lot of money in licencing (both programme format to other channels worldwide and in merchandising) and C) because they axed it before, only for Channel5 to snap up the presenters and production team and produce a car programme while the BBC had no competition.
They would think twice about making that mistake again (although they might not have learnt).

Jonathan Ross wasn't technically axed. His contract ended and because of the controversy and his huge fee, the BBC decided not to renew his contract.
Clarkson isn't paid as much as Ross.

The TG budget has already been cut, that's why the series' are only 6 episodes now. They decided they would rather continue with the same size budget per episode but fewer episodes per series, than have more episodes with less spent on each.
Granted I think it does need a review of how it's spending the money, more stuff shot in the UK (eg: you don't need to go to Italy to film 3 hot hatches, there are some great roads in the UK) and so on.
And yes after 10 years it does need a little refresh, but what would you do to do that, whilst still keeping the bits everyone loves?


Offline Roverdose

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 335
  • So long and thanks for all the fish!
Re: Top Gear
« Reply #105 on: 19 February 2012, 19:44 »
put more cars in it for a start, focus less on the presenters and more on the motors, each program used to be rammed with loads of different topics, now its the same layout every time, 1 car test, 1 stupid challenge and the studio bollox, im looking forward to being utterly dissapointed tonight, honestly don't know hwy i still watch it. Still have that glimmer of hope inside me that it might be a gem. but honestly haven't enjoyed one properly since they bought ex army machines and ripped those houses down. soooo funny!

Offline richw911

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 18,673
  • The Linkmeister and an OEM Freak.
Re: Top Gear
« Reply #106 on: 19 February 2012, 20:37 »
Ferrari / BMW 1 series anyone?

MKIV Mod Squadâ„¢ a part of the headlight police.

Offline scottv6

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 354
Re: Top Gear
« Reply #107 on: 19 February 2012, 21:12 »
the end was sooo funny with the benton sketch lmao

Offline The Mighty Elvi

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,449
  • I'm better than you today.
Re: Top Gear
« Reply #108 on: 19 February 2012, 21:23 »
Fenton!

 :rolleyes:


Offline scottv6

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 354
Re: Top Gear
« Reply #109 on: 19 February 2012, 21:28 »
wasnt the 1 on youtube with the dog benton?