Poll

Which one?

Neither of these cars because I like to click the third option that never makes any sense. I'm just that way inclined.
6 (20.7%)
The Polo, because it's a VW and evey single other make is pointless.
9 (31%)
Neither of these cars because I like to click the third option that never makes any sense. I'm just that way inclined.
14 (48.3%)

Total Members Voted: 29

Author Topic: So..... (part 2)  (Read 3049 times)

Offline DubFan

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,437
Re: So..... (part 2)
« Reply #20 on: 28 November 2011, 05:18 »
That second Skoda looks alright and essentially underneath it's a Polo.

I've owned a 6n Polo and found it good to drive. I've also driven a friends Corsa of that age and wasn't impressed with it.
My 6n Polo was a 1.4 and plenty nippy, well built both inside and out.
If they are around the same mileage, check out the service history and see what's been done, drive them both.

Have you looked at the Spanish equivalent?
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/seat-ibiza-v-reg-64-289-miles-great-condition-/160687579685?pt=Automobiles_UK&hash=item2569b9e225


Offline Guy

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 6,118
Re: So..... (part 2)
« Reply #21 on: 28 November 2011, 09:52 »
that olop could look quite rude slammed on some small steelies  :smiley:

Offline Ninja

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,737
  • 19 smiles per gallon
Re: So..... (part 2)
« Reply #22 on: 28 November 2011, 19:32 »
cant remember from your other list, but have you considered a spot of skoda action, if not then you need to consider them, and as if by magic, close enough to view

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/SKODA-FELICIA-1-3-PETROL-TAX-TEST-72K-PAS-VGC-FSH-LONG-MOT-MUST-SEE-PX-/320800906489?pt=Automobiles_UK&hash=item4ab1395cf9#ht_716wt_1263


 :smiley:


Tried a felicia 1.3 mate - £2000 per year. Apparantely all VAG drivers are nutters...

Offline Ninja

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,737
  • 19 smiles per gallon

Offline Ninja

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,737
  • 19 smiles per gallon
Re: So..... (part 2)
« Reply #24 on: 28 November 2011, 19:34 »
That second Skoda looks alright and essentially underneath it's a Polo.

I've owned a 6n Polo and found it good to drive. I've also driven a friends Corsa of that age and wasn't impressed with it.
My 6n Polo was a 1.4 and plenty nippy, well built both inside and out.
If they are around the same mileage, check out the service history and see what's been done, drive them both.

Have you looked at the Spanish equivalent?
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/seat-ibiza-v-reg-64-289-miles-great-condition-/160687579685?pt=Automobiles_UK&hash=item2569b9e225


Super high insurance  :cry:

Offline JC

  • 10k hero
  • *
  • Posts: 13,429
  • Back in the North.
Re: So..... (part 2)
« Reply #25 on: 28 November 2011, 21:52 »
oh well, Looks like its Corsa time then, deffo need a Vauxhall section.

Offline Bellend

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,721
Re: So..... (part 2)
« Reply #26 on: 28 November 2011, 23:30 »
What engine in the Corsa?

Late or early one?

Feel cheap as crap inside but if it's the better 1.4, I'd prefer the extra poke ADL, 1l Polo's are nippy enough for a town commute but I think I'd commit suicide once I got out of the traffic.

What's up with all the Pauxhall owners? Reccession has got bad.   :grin:

Where all my moneys went.

Golf MK3 1.6. Golf MK3 8v GTI.