Author Topic: E=MC2, not any more  (Read 5962 times)

Offline Jay

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,416
  • balding fat cvnt
Re: E=MC2, not any more
« Reply #30 on: 19 November 2011, 19:47 »
 :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Passat B5.5 2.3 V5 170, with all the extras.

Want some online storage? Click here to sign up for a Dropbox account.

But for the purest engine experience, displacement has no replacement. All other methods are simply attempts to artificially recreate the benefits of displacement.

VW BUSH

  • Guest
Re: E=MC2, not any more
« Reply #31 on: 20 November 2011, 10:54 »
lol love the new theories being developed, maybe we should sell this forum as a think tank for the enlightened....

Looking at the new method to measure the particles/waves/cheeseburgers under the alsps, it seems as though it has broken the speed of cheeseburger/light.
If true we have to start re thinking some of our flormulae.

With this new knowledge maybe we could actually make a warp engine, how to bolt it into a Mk3 is another story as I dont think the ABF gearbox can stand that much torque :grin:

Offline gibby

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,675
  • Champions of Europe,ooh ,just the five times then!
Re: E=MC2, not any more
« Reply #32 on: 20 November 2011, 14:22 »
Lenda at her finest :grin:

http://www.golfgtiforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=211985.msg1964606#msg1964606

Classic. :laugh: A pound to a penny says he still thinks he's right. :rolleyes: .......but if you win and I do give you that pound, you'll still only have £0 in your pocket as 0 + 1 = 0 you see. :grin:
......now officially dubless.

Offline Jay

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,416
  • balding fat cvnt
Re: E=MC2, not any more
« Reply #33 on: 20 November 2011, 14:25 »
 :grin:
Passat B5.5 2.3 V5 170, with all the extras.

Want some online storage? Click here to sign up for a Dropbox account.

But for the purest engine experience, displacement has no replacement. All other methods are simply attempts to artificially recreate the benefits of displacement.

Offline danny_p

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,646
Re: E=MC2, not any more
« Reply #34 on: 20 November 2011, 16:00 »
ummm  wonder what happens if one swaps speed of light out for speed of nutreno as the cosmic speed limute.   anyway i wants a time machene  thatway the mk3 golf will never happen  :evil:
all the VW's have gone bar 1.

Offline snifferdog

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,048
Re: E=MC2, not any more
« Reply #35 on: 20 November 2011, 16:34 »
ummm  wonder what happens if one swaps speed of light out for speed of nutreno as the cosmic speed limute.   anyway i wants a time machene  thatway the mk3 golf will never happen  :evil:

4000 posts on a golf forum and you havent figured out that the mk3 is the best gti to date  :tongue: :grin: :grin:

Offline rob.043

  • Here all the time
  • ****
  • Posts: 496
Re: E=MC2, not any more
« Reply #36 on: 20 November 2011, 17:22 »
but is it stationary when being viewed by an observer traveling the same speed..

No because they will always be travelling at a different speed to some extent.


The true origin of reality is this:

Apparently, the speed of light is NOT relative. From Einsteins theories, the speed of light is constant, regardless of the relative motion of the observer. As such, an observer on an asteroid (say) hurtling towards the sun at 100,000 mph, will measure the speed of the light (usually about 300,000,000 m/s in a vacume) emitted form the sun to be 300,000,000 m/s, and not 300,000,000 - 100,000...  Similarly, when moving at the same speed away from the sun, its still measures 300,000,000 m/s.  :nerd:

Offline topher

  • Administrator
  • Serious forum addict
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,594
  • fully functioning
Re: E=MC2, not any more
« Reply #37 on: 20 November 2011, 17:54 »
did you even read any of this thread? :laugh:

Offline trog_nfs

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Re: E=MC2, not any more
« Reply #38 on: 20 November 2011, 17:55 »
ummm  wonder what happens if one swaps speed of light out for speed of nutreno as the cosmic speed limute.   anyway i wants a time machene  thatway the mk3 golf will never happen  :evil:

4000 posts on a golf forum and you havent figured out that the mk3 is the best gti to date  :tongue: :grin: :grin:

Or how to spell  :shocked:

Offline Adam

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,194
Re: E=MC2, not any more
« Reply #39 on: 20 November 2011, 18:58 »
If a car hits a wall at 30mph, its a 30mph total collision
If a car hits a car at 30mph and the other car is doing 30mph, its a 60mph total collision
If light hits light at the speed of light what is the total collision speed?

Down Hill From Here.